Influence of the options for the induction of general anesthesia for elective abdominal delivery on condition of newborns
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2019-10-3-18-23
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate and compare the influence of the options for the induction of general anesthesia for elective abdominal delivery on the condition of newborns.
Materials and Methods: The study included 160 newborns, which were born via elective cesarean section under general anaesthesia. All newborns were divided into 4 groups, 40 in each, depending on the anesthetics used for the induction of general anesthesia. In the 1st group, thiopental sodium 5 mg/kg was used; in the 2nd - sodium thiopental 7 mg/kg; in the 3rd - propofol 2,5 mg/kg; in the 4th- sodium thiopental 5 mg/kg with sevoflurane (0,5 MAC). The influence of anesthesia on condition of newborns was evaluated by the Apgar scale and the neurological and adaptive capacity scale NACS.
Results: statistically significant differences were not found in assessing newborns on scales.
Conclusion: All the researched drugs and their doses used for the induction of general anesthesia during elective abdominal delivery do not adversely effect on the neurological and somatic status of the newborn.
About the Authors
A. N. Biryukov
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexey N. Biryukov - Head of anesthesiology and intensive care unit of the clinic of thermal injuries and plastic surgery.
St. Petersburg
A. G. Klimov
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexey G. Klimov - Doctor of medicine, Professor, Professor of the Department of anesthesiology and intensive care.
St. Petersburg
E. N. Ershov
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeniy N. Ershov - Candidate of Medical Sciences, Teacher of the Department of anesthesiology and intensive care.
St. Petersburg
O. V. Pashchenko
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg V. Pashchenko - Candidate of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of anesthesiology and intensive care unit of the clinic of obstetrics and gynecology.
St. Petersburg
References
1. Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):490-499. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5
2. Mi J, Liu F. Rate of caesarean section is alarming in China. Lancet. 2014;383(9927):1463-1464. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60716-9
3. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2015. 2015;2(4):89-98.
4. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. Public Library of Science one. 2016; 11(2):e0148343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.
5. Hawkins JL, Gibbs C, Orleans M. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:135-143.
6. Kinsella SM. A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 Caesarean sections. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(8):822-832. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05499.x
7. Guasch E, Montenegro P, Ochoa C. General anaesthesia and obstetric bleeding in caesarean section. One year's experience in a university hospital. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012;59(8):415-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.05.030
8. Chestnut DH. Chestnuts obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2010:523-525.
9. Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953;32(4):260-267.
10. Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. (February 15,). "The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants". New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;344(7):467–471
11. Amiel-Tison C, Barrier G, Shnider SM, Levinson G, Hughes SC, Stefani SJ. A new neurologic and adaptive capacity scoring system for evaluating obstetric medications in full-term newborns. Anesthesiology. 1982;56(5):340–350.
12. Aydin GB, Coskun F, Sahin A, Aypar U. Influence of sevoflurane and desflurane on neurological and adaptive capacity scores in newborns. Saudi Med J. 2008;29(6):841-846.
13. Simard MN, Lambert J, Lachance C, Audibert F, Gosselin J. Interexaminer reliability of Amiel-Tison neurological assessments. Pediatr Neurol. 2009;41(5):347-352.
14. Salisbury AL, Lester BM, Seifer R, Lagasse L, Bauer CR, Shankaran S. Prenatal cocaine use and maternal depression: Effects on infant neurobehavior. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2009;31:69.
15. Brown DL. Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller's Anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Co; 2010:1620-1621.
16. Sharifi M, Hashemi SJ, Jabalameli M. Associated neurologic and adaptive capacity scoring system in infants born to mothers undergoing cesarean with maternal factors and fetal anesthesia. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2011:1106–115.
17. Hodgkinson R, Bhatt M, Kim SS, Grewal G, Marx GF. Neonatal neurobehavioral tests following cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132(6):670–674.
18. Abboud TK, Nagappala S, Murakawa K, David S, Haroutunian S, Zakarian M. Comparison of the effects of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section on neonatal neurologic and adaptive capacity scores. Anesth Analg. 1985;64(10):996–1000.
19. Datta S, Kodali B, Segal S. Obstetric Anesthesia Handbook. 15th ed. Boston: Springer Verlag; 2010:53-63.
20. Datta S, Ostheimer G.W, Weiss J.B, Brown W.U, Alper M.H. Neonatal effect of prolonged anesthetic induction for cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 58: 331-335.
21. Crawford JS, Burton OM, Davies P. Anaesthesia for section: further refinements of a technique. Br J Anaesth. 1973;45:726-732.
22. Afolabi BB, Lesi FEA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;10:CD004350. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3.
23. Hashemi SJ, Jabalameli M, Mokhtary F. Effects of different anesthetic techniques on neurologic and adaptation capacity in newborn with elective cesarean section. Adv Biomed Res. Nov 2015; 4: 249. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.170244PMCID: PMC4685640.
24. Aleksandrovich YS, Ryazanova OV, Murieva EA, Pshenysnov KV, Mikhailov AV. The effect of anesthesia during abdominal delivery on the neurological status of the newborn in the early neonatal period. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. 2011;1:15-18.
Review
For citations:
Biryukov A.N., Klimov A.G., Ershov E.N., Pashchenko O.V. Influence of the options for the induction of general anesthesia for elective abdominal delivery on condition of newborns. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2019;10(3):18-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2019-10-3-18-23
Views:
2209
Email this article 