COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PERMANENT CARDIAC PACING IN PACEMAKER-DEPENDENT PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT PATTERNS OF RIGHT VENTRICLE EXCITATION
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2015-2-33-37
Abstract
Purpose: comparative analysis of the effectiveness of permanent cardiac pacing and quality of life in the pacemaker-dependent chronical heart failure patients with different patterns of excitation of the right ventricle.
Materials and methods: we examined 108 patients with hemodynamically significant atrioventricular conduction disturbances and chronical heart failure who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation. All patients were divided into 2 groups depending on performed right ventricle pacing site.
Results: in assessing the electrocardiogram have been improvements in the dynamics of the QRS morphology in patients with alternative para-Hisian site pacing. It was established that the interventricular mechanical delay in patients of the apical group pacing was significantly higher compared with an alternative stimulation patients group. Revealed relatively low exercise tolerance, as well as the lowest values of the physical component of patients health in the apical pacing group.
Summary: the permanent para-Hisian pacing in patients with chronical heart failure can be obtained normal morphology of the QRS complex with reduced ventricular dyssynchrony. Is the preferred alternative method to the apical pacing .
About the Authors
V. V. Korshunov
Rostov Regional Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Department of surgical treatment of complex cardiac arrhythmias and pacing
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. V. Chudinov
Rostov State Medical University, Department of Internal Medicine with the basics of physical therapy № 1
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. P. Terentiev
Rostov Regional Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Department of surgical treatment of complex cardiac arrhythmias and pacing
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al. MOST Investigators Ventricular pacing or dual chamber pacing for sinus node dysfunction N Engl J Med 2002;346:1854-1862.
2. Sharma AD, Rizo-Patron C, Hallstrom AP, et al. DAVID Investigators Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID Trial Heart Rhythm 2005;2:830-834.
3. Sweeney MO, Prinzen FW. A new paradigm for physiologic ventricular pacing J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:282-288.
4. Victor F, Mabo P, et al. A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:238–42.
5. De Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk J. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacinga quantitative review. Europace 2003;5:275-278.
6. Yee R, Klein GJ, Krahn AC, Skanes AC. Selective site pacing: tools and training. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:894–6.
7. Occhetta E, Bortnik M, Magnani A, et al. Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1938–45.
8. Deshmukh P, Casavant DA, Romanyshyn M, Anderson K. Permanent, direct His-bundle pacing: a novel approach to cardiac pacing in patients with normal His-Purkinje activation. Circulation 2000;101: 869–77.
9. Lu F, Iaizzo PA, et al. Isolated Atrial Segment Pacing: An Alternative to His Bundle Pacing After Atrioventricular Junctional Ablation (J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1443–9.)
Review
For citations:
Korshunov V.V., Chudinov G.V., Terentiev V.P. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PERMANENT CARDIAC PACING IN PACEMAKER-DEPENDENT PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT PATTERNS OF RIGHT VENTRICLE EXCITATION. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2015;(2):33-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2015-2-33-37
Views:
401
Email this article 