Treating of duodenal perforation following endoscopic retrograde transpapillary manipulations
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2019-10-1-42-48
Abstract
Objective: valuation of diff erent duodenal perforation surgical management following endoscopic retrograde transpapillary manipulations. Materials and methods: thirty-one patients with duodenal perforation following transpapillary manipulations (17 own observations, 14 — admission from other hospitals). Th e 14 (45.2 %) cases had a diagnosis less than 24 hours, 17 (54.8 %) — more than 24 hours aft er injury. Twenty patients had the primary reconstruction of duodenum with various drainage options of zone of injury. Sixteen patients had a two-stage surgery procedure: 5 cases aft er of primary reconstruction of duodenum and 11 — like a primary surgery (more than a day aft er injury). Results: aft er primary of duodenum reconstruction 11 patients (55.0 %) had no complications, 5 (25.0 %) — were re-operated, 4 (20.0 %) — were died. Aft er two-stage surgery procedure 9 patients (56.3 %) had no complications, fi ve (31.2 %) had surgical complications, 2 (12.5 %) were died. Conclusion: the primary of duodenum reconstruction can be performing, when the duodenal perforation there is less than a day. When there is a clinic of septic complication of retroperitoneum and abdominal cavity, two-stage surgery procedure is justifi ed.
About the Authors
Vyacheslav I. KorobkaRussian Federation
MD, PhD, Head Physician
Associate Professor
Competing Interests: Отсутствие конфликта интересов
Sergey V. Tolstopyatov
Russian Federation
Head of Surgery Department
Competing Interests: Отсутствие конфликта интересов
Alexander M. Shapovalov
Russian Federation
PhD, Surgeon
Competing Interests: Отсутствие конфликта интересов
Roman V. Korobka
PhD, Surgeon
Assistant of the Department Surgery
Competing Interests: Отсутствие конфликта интересов
References
1. Deryabina EA, Tarasov AN. Optimization of endoscopic treatment of patients with benign obstructive diseases of the biliary tract. Medical science and education of the Urals. 2008;5(55):94-96. (In Russ).
2. Bostancı Ö, Battal M, Yazıcı P, Demir U, Alkım C. Management of iatrogenic injuries due to endoscopic sphincterotomy: Surgical or conservative approaches. Turkish journal of surgery. 2018;34:24-27. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3820.
3. Lucas C.E. Th e therapeutic challenges in treating duodenal injury. Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery. 2013;2(3):126-133. doi:10.5005/jpjournals-10030-1073.
4. Chertoff J, Khullar V, Burke L. Duodenal perforation following esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with cautery and epinephrine injection for peptic ulcer disease: An interesting case of nonoperative management in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2015;10:121-125. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.03.011.
5. Turner RC, Steff en ChM, Boyd P. Endoscopic duodenal perforation: surgical strategies in a regional centre. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2014;9:11-8. doi:10.1186/1749- 7922-9-11.
6. Stapfer M, Selby R, Stain S, Katkhouda N, Parekh D, et al. Management of duodenal perforation aft er endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Annals of surgery. 2000;232(2):191-8.
7. Machado NO. Management of duodenal perforation postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? Journal of the Pancreas. 2012;13(1):18-25.
8. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, Arvanitakis M, Bories E. et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016; 48(7):657-685. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108641.
Review
For citations:
Korobka V.I., Tolstopyatov S.V., Shapovalov A.M., Korobka R.V. Treating of duodenal perforation following endoscopic retrograde transpapillary manipulations. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2019;10(1):42-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2019-10-1-42-48