Aggravation of hepatic encephalopathy after portosystemic shunting interventions (TIPS procedure) for complicated portal hypertension
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2018-9-1-86-92
Abstract
Objective. Creation of portosystemic shunts (TIPS operation) leads frequently to aggravation of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Aim of the study is to improve results of prophylaxis and treatment of HE after TIPS procedure in patients with complications of portal hypertension due to liver cirrhosis.
Material and Methods. 207 patients underwent TIPS procedure in our clinic in 2007-17. Indications for TIPS placement were life-threatening complications of portal hypertension: variceal esophageal bleeding (in 156) and refractory ascites (in 51). Patients were divided in 3 groups comparable by main clinical characteristics. Indexes of portal hemodynamics, such as pre- and post-TIPS blood pressure in portal vein, and portosystemic gradient (PSG) were studied.
Results. Overall, post-TIPS HE within 6 weeks was different in each of 3 groups: 29,3% at 1st, 18,8% at 2nd, 13,2% at 3rd as result of individual algorithm of treatment based on intensive measures of complex treatment at 2nd and 3rd groups. High prognostic value of pre-TIPS PSG more than 18 mm Hg and difference between pre- and post-TIPS PSG more than 8 mm Hg was established. It required more intensive therapy in 2nd and 3rd groups which resulted
Conclusions. Aggravation of post-TIPS HE is a predictable complication. Level of pre-TIPS PSG more than 18 mm Hg is associated with an increased risk of HE. The correlation of difference between pre- and post-TIPS PSG more than 8 mm Hg and post-TIPS HE was revealed also. It demands more intensive measures of prophylaxis and treatment. Inclusion of serotonin to treatment’s programme allows us to improve the elimination of products of gut micribiota by regulating of intestinal motility.About the Authors
Yu. V. KhoronkoRussian Federation
Chair of operative surgery, Chief
Department of surgery, Surgeon
Competing Interests: conflict of interests is absent
A. V. Blikyan
Russian Federation
Chair of operative surgery, professor's assistant
Competing Interests: conflict of interests is absent
M. A. Kozyrevskiy
Russian Federation
Chair of operative surgery, professor's assistant
Competing Interests: conflict of interests is absent
References
1. Kotiv BN, Dzidzava II, Turmakhanov ST. Choice of method of portocaval shunting for esophageal variceal bleedings in portal hypertension. Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014;78:62-66. (In Russ).
2. Riggio O, Nardelli S, Moscucci F, Pasquale C, Rigoda L, Merli M. Hepatic encephalopathy aſt er transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Clin Liver Dis. 2012;16(1):133-146. doi: 10/1016/j.cld.2011.12.008
3. Casadaban LC, Parvinian A, Minocha J, Lakhoo J, Grant CW, Ray CE. Clearing the Confusion over Hepatic Encephalopathy aſt er TIPS Creation: Incidence, Prognostic Factors, and Clinical Outcomes. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60(4):1059-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10620-14-3391-0
4. He F, Dai S,Xiao Z, Wang L, Yue Z, Zhao H et al. Pathological Predictors of Shunt Stenosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy aſt er Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt. Biomed Res Int. 2016. 2016.3681731. doi: 10.1155/2016/3681731
5. Anisimov AYu, Vertkin AL, Devyatov AV, Dzidzava II, Ivash-kin VT, Kitsenko EA, et al. Practical recommendations for treatment of variceal esophageal and gastric bleedings. Mos-kovskii khirurgicheskii zhurnal. 2013;6:41-54. (In Russ).
6. Zatevakhin II, Shipovskii VN, Tsitsiashvili MSh, Monakhov DV. Portal’naya gipertenziya. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. [Portal hypertension. Practical guidelines]. Moscow: Buki Vedi Publ.; 2015. (In Russ).
7. Gaba RC. Transjugalar Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation with Embolization or Obliteration for Variceal Bleeding. Tech Vasc Interventional Rad. 2016;19(1):21-35. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2016.01.003
8. Shertsinger AG, Chzhao AV, Ivashkin VT, Maevskaya MV, Pavlov ChS, Vertkin AL et al. Treatment of varicose esophageal and gastric bleeding. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2013;18(3):110-129. (In Russ).
9. Sapronova NG. Portal hypertension: particalar qualities of treatment (review). Meditsinskii vestnik Yuga Rossii. 2014;(2):21-29. (In Russ).
10. de Franchis R. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015; 63(3):743-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.022
11. Ivashkin VT, Maevskaya MV, Pavlov ChS, Fedos’ina EA, Bessonova EN, Pirogova IYu et al. Treatment of liver cirrhosis complications: Clinical guidelines of the Russian Scientifi c Liver Society and Russian gastroenterological association. Rossiiskii zhurnal gastroenterologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii. 2016;26(4):71-101 (In Russ).
12. Pavlov ChS, Damulin IV, Ivashkin V.T. Hepatic encephalopathy: pathogenesis, clinical picture, diagnosis, treatment. Rossiiskii zhurnal gastroenterologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii. 2016;26(1):44-53 (In Russ).
13. Arab JP, Martin-Mateos RM, Shah VH. Gut-liver axis, cirrhosis and portal hypertension: the chicken and the egg. Hepatol Int [Internet]. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9798-x
14. Cirillo C, Vanden Berghe P, Tack J. Role of serotonin in gastrointestinal physiology and pathology. Minerva Endocrinol. 2011;36(4):311-324.
Review
For citations:
Khoronko Yu.V., Blikyan A.V., Kozyrevskiy M.A. Aggravation of hepatic encephalopathy after portosystemic shunting interventions (TIPS procedure) for complicated portal hypertension. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2018;9(1):86-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2018-9-1-86-92