THE ADVANTAGES OF USING PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTI-ROTATION (PFNA) WITH THE AUGMENTATION IN THE OSTEOSYNTHESIS OF HIP FRACTURES ON BACKGROUND OF OSTEOPOROSIS
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2016-3-18-21
Abstract
This article provides an analysis of the literature data devoted to research on the use of the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) with and without augmentation in patients in fractures of the osteoporotic femur. The authors used the descriptive and analytical methods. The search for relevant publications carried out in the databases: Google Scholar, e-Library Medline, and the Cochrane Consort library. To date, the evidence base for the benefits of using PFNA with augmentation in osteosynthesis of hip fractures accompanied by osteoporosis need to provide the randomized controlled trials, despite the obvious theoretical and experimental advantages of the method.
About the Authors
N. V. Zagorodny
Russian National Research Medical University n.a. N.V. Pirogov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Volna
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Department of traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Department of traumatology and Orthopaedics
I. I. Panfilov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Department of traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Department of traumatology and Orthopaedics
References
1. Михайлов Е.Е. Частота переломов проксимального отдела бедренной кости в различных регионах мира // Научнопрактическая ревматология. 2000. №3. С.34-45.
2. Ершова О.Б. и др. Организация помощи больным с переломами проксимального отдела бедра на фоне остеопороза // Русс. Мед. Журнал. Ревматология. – 2010. – Т. 27. – С. 1672.
3. Cooper C., Campion G., Melton L. J. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection //Osteoporosis international. – 1992. – Vol. 2(6). – P. 285-289.
4. Johnell O., Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures // Osteoporosis international. – 2005. – Vol. 16(2). – P. S3-S7.
5. Kanis J. A. et al. International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment //Journal of bone and mineral research. – 2002. – Vol. 17(7). – P. 1237-1244.
6. Lau E. M. C. The epidemiology of hip fracture in Asia: an update //Osteoporosis International. – 1996. – Vol. 6(3). – P.19-23.
7. Быстров С.В. Пути улучшения специализированной травматологической помощи с переломами проксимального отдела бедренной кости в Тверской области: дис. ... канд. мед. наук: 14.01.15. Тверь, 2014. 133 с.
8. Кривова, А.В. Эпидемиология переломов проксимального отдела бедра в популяции города Твери. / А.В.Кривова, Р.В. Тимаев, С.С. Родионова // Вестник травматологии и ортопедии имени Приорова. – 2006. №2. – С.17-20.
9. Нурлыгаянов Р.З., Хафизов Н.Х., Файзуллин А.А. Частота переломов проксимального отдела бедренной кости среди жителей города Уфы (ретроспективное эпидемиологическое исследование) // Остеопороз и остеопатии. 2009. №1. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chastota-perelomovproksimalnogo-otdela-bedrennoy-kosti-sredi-zhiteley-gorodaufy-retrospektivnoe-epidemiologicheskoe-issledovanie (дата обращения: 15.01.2016).
10. Загородний Н.В., Голухов Г.Н., Волна А.А. Диагностика и лечение переломов проксимального отдела бедра у лиц пожилого и старческого возраста // Учебно-методическое пособие, М.: РУДН, 2012. 16 с.
11. Волна А.А., Владыкин А.Б. Переломы проксимального отдела плеча: возможность использования штифтов //Margo anterior. – 2001. – №. 5-6. – С. 1-16.
12. Родионова С.С., Колондаев А.Ф., Солод Э.И. Комбинированное лечение переломов шейки бедренной кости на фоне остеопороза // РМЖ. 2004. №24. С.1388.
13. Hsu J. T. et al. The effects of cortical bone thickness and trabecular bone strength on noninvasive measures of the implant primary stability using synthetic bone models //Clinical implant dentistry and related research. – 2013. – Vol.15(2). – P. 251-261.
14. Wirtz C. et al. High failure rate of trochanteric fracture osteosynthesis with proximal femoral locking compression plate //Injury. – 2013. – Vol.44(6). – P. 751-756.
15. Torstrick F.B., Guldberg R.E. Local Strategies to Prevent and Treat Osteoporosis //Current osteoporosis reports. – 2014. – Vol.12(1). – P. 33-40.
16. Rodríguez-Merchán E.C., Gómez-Cardero P., MartínezLloreda Á. Complex Fractures of the Distal Femur. – Springer International Publishing, 2014. – P. 61-76.
17. Fensky F. et al. Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures—a biomechanical cadaver study //Injury. – 2013. – Vol. 44(6). – P. 802-807.
18. Blankstein M. et al. Assessment of intraosseous femoral head pressures during cement augmentation of the perforated proximal femur nail antirotation blade //Journal of orthopaedic trauma. – 2014. – Vol. 28(7). – P. 398-402.
19. Erhart S. et al. Is augmentation a possible salvage procedure after lateral migration of the proximal femur nail antirotation? //Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. – 2012. – Vol.132(11). – P.1577-1581.
20. Erhart S., Schmoelz W., Blauth M., Lenich A.. Biomechanical effect of bone cement augmentation on rotational stability and pull-out strength of the Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation™ // ncbi.nlm.nih.gov URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=10.1016%2Fj.injury.2011.04.010 (дата обращения: 18.01.16).
21. Wähnert D. et al. Implant augmentation: adding bone cement to improve the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures: a biomechanical study using human cadaver bones //Medicine. – 2014. – Vol. 93(23). – P.166.
22. Wähnert D. et al. The potential of implant augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures: a biomechanical study //Injury. – 2013. – Vol.44(6). – P.808-812.
23. Wähnert D. et al. Cement augmentation of lag screws: an investigation on biomechanical advantages //Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. – 2013. – Vol.133(3). – P. 373-379.
24. Wähnert D., Raschke M. J., Fuchs T. Cement augmentation of the navigated iliosacral screw in the treatment of insufficiency fractures of the sacrum. A new method using modified implants //International orthopaedics. – 2013. – Vol.37(6). – P. 1147-1150.
Review
For citations:
Zagorodny N.V., Volna A.A., Panfilov I.I. THE ADVANTAGES OF USING PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTI-ROTATION (PFNA) WITH THE AUGMENTATION IN THE OSTEOSYNTHESIS OF HIP FRACTURES ON BACKGROUND OF OSTEOPOROSIS. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2016;(3):18-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2016-3-18-21
Views:
671
Email this article 