Compression hemostatic sutures in obstetrics: from history to modernity
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2026-17-2-24-30
Abstract
This review presents an analysis of the development and evolution of uterine compression hemostatic sutures as a surgical method for controlling obstetric hypotonic hemorrhage. A search of Russian and international scientific literature was conducted across the following citation databases: «eLIBRARY», «PubMed», «Google Scholar» and «Scopus», covering the period 1997–2024. The key stages of the method’s development are described, from the introduction of the B-Lynch suture to its modern modifications (Hayman, Cho, Pereira, and Radzinsky–Rymashevsky techniques). A comparative analysis of their effectiveness, technical features, and potential adverse outcomes is provided, including the risks of myometrial necrosis, Asherman syndrome, and infectious complications. The analysis of the literature has shown that, despite the high effectiveness of classical techniques (up to 90–97%), their use is associated with a risk of postoperative complications. Particular attention is given to the modern technique developed by the Rostov school — the “braided” compression suture (Rymashevsky-Kantsurova), which ensures reliable hemostasis, uniform distribution of compression, and a reduction in complication rates. It is concluded that obstetric surgery is evolving toward organ-preserving approaches and further refinement of surgical hemostasis.
About the Authors
M. R. KantsurovaRussian Federation
Maria R. Kantsurova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), assistant of the Department of obstetrics and gynecology №1
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Alexander N. Rymashevsky, Natalia G. Sapronova are Members of the Editorial Board of the Journal «Medacal Herald of the South of Russia». The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.
A. N. Rymashevsky
Russian Federation
Alexander N. Rymashevsky, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №1
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Alexander N. Rymashevsky, Natalia G. Sapronova are Members of the Editorial Board of the Journal «Medacal Herald of the South of Russia». The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.
N. G. Sapronova
Russian Federation
Natalia G. Sapronova, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, head of the Department of surgical diseases №1
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Alexander N. Rymashevsky, Natalia G. Sapronova are Members of the Editorial Board of the Journal «Medacal Herald of the South of Russia». The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.
L. V. Kaushanskaya
Russian Federation
Lyudmila V. Kaushanskaya, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, Professor of the Department of Gynecology №1
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Alexander N. Rymashevsky, Natalia G. Sapronova are Members of the Editorial Board of the Journal «Medacal Herald of the South of Russia». The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.
A. E. Volkov
Russian Federation
Andrey E. Volkov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Gynecology №1
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Alexander N. Rymashevsky, Natalia G. Sapronova are Members of the Editorial Board of the Journal «Medacal Herald of the South of Russia». The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.
E. E. Myshanskaya
Russian Federation
Elizaveta E. Myshanskaya, 5th year student of the Faculty of Medicine and Prevention
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Alexander N. Rymashevsky, Natalia G. Sapronova are Members of the Editorial Board of the Journal «Medacal Herald of the South of Russia». The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.
V. V. Veretennikova
Russian Federation
Victoria V. Veretennikova, 5th year student of the Faculty of Medicine and Prevention
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Alexander N. Rymashevsky, Natalia G. Sapronova are Members of the Editorial Board of the Journal «Medacal Herald of the South of Russia». The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.
References
1. Baranov I.I., Zhukovsky Y.G., Baev O.R., Kukarskaya I.I., Kilicheva I.I., Tskhay V.B. Zhu-kovsky’s balloon tamponade in the prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2014;(11):54-66. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 21361761 EDN RZLYJX.
2. B-Lynch C., Coker A., Lawal A.H., Abu J., Cowen M.J. The BLynch surgical technique for the control of massive postpartum haemorrhage: an alternative to hysterectomy? Five cases reported. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(3):372-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11471.x
3. Kaplanoglu D., Bulbul M., Kaplanoglu M., Dilbaz B. The effect of B-Lynch uterine compression suture performed for uterine atony on future menstrual pattern and reproductive outcome. Ginekol Pol. 2024;95(9):687-692. https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.92963.
4. Nalini N., Kumar A., Prasad M.K., Singh A.V., Sharma S., Singh B., Singh T.H., Kumar P., Singh H.V., Singh S. Obstetric and Maternal Outcomes After B-Lynch Compression Sutures: A Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(11):e31306. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31306.
5. Strizhakov A.N., Davydov A.I., Budanov P.V. Uterine necrosis after compression sutures due to postpartum hypotonic haemorrhage. Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2013;12(3):76-79. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 19414190 EDN: QIVWED
6. Buyanova S.N., Mgeliashvili M.V., Puchkova N.V., Gukasyan S.A. The initial results of complex hemostatic therapy for postpartum hemorrhage. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist = Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2019;19(5):72-76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20191905172
7. Rathat G, Do Trinh P, Mercier G, Reyftmann L, Dechanet C, et al. Synechia after uterine compression sutures. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):405-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.055. PMID: 20883989.
8. Al Riyami N, Hui D, Herer E, Nevo O. Uterine compression sutures as an effective treatment for postpartum hemorrhage: case series. AJP Rep. 2011;1(1):47-52. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1280570
9. Saidalieva D.A., Dodkhoeva, M.F. Puropental-inflammatory diseases of puerperia after different types of hemostasis. Mother and Child. 2024;(2):56-61. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 80458716 EDN RQZHGQ.
10. Cho JH, Jun HS, Lee CN. Hemostatic suturing technique for uterine bleeding during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(1):129-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00852-8
11. Rukhliada N.N., Krylov K.Yu., Semenova E.R., Biryukova E.I., Tsechoeva L.Sh., Revenko A.S. Uterine compression sutures as a therapy for massive postpartum hemorrhage: a 5-year report. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2022;28(4):151‑159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/repro202228041151
12. Hayman RG, Arulkumaran S, Steer PJ. Uterine compression sutures: surgical management of postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(3):502-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01643-x
13. Artymuk N.V., Marochko T.Y., Apresyan S.V., Artymuk D.A. Methods of compression hemostasis in the management of postpartum hemorrhage. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023;12:16–24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.203
14. Kwong LT, Wong SF, So PL. Menstrual, fertility and psychological impacts after uterine compression sutures for postpartum hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05530-8
15. Kwong LT, So PL, Wong SF. Uterine compression sutures with additional hemostatic procedures for the management of postpartum hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(11):2332-2339. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14426
16. Pereira A, Nunes F, Pedroso S, Saraiva J, Retto H, Meirinho M. Compressive uterine sutures to treat postpartum bleeding secondary to uterine atony. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(3):569-572. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000168434.28222.d3
17. Umansky M.N., Gugueva A.V., Opruzhenkov A.V., Lysenko O.A. Cases of organ-preserving surgery in patients with severe preeclampsia. Glavnyy vrach Yuga Rossii. 2021;4(79):3943. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 46318409 EDN LRUMSY.
18. Rymashevsky A.N., Radzinsky V.E., Krasnikova N.A., Terekhina L.A., Lukash A.I., Olenev A.S. A surgical component of treatment for obstetric hypotonic bleeding. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;(3):30-33. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 11522809 EDN ISYKEQ.
19. Kantsurova M.R., Rymashevsky A.N., Volkov A.E. Rationale for application of a new compression suture to stop hypotonic haemorrhage in puerperant women. Siberian Medical Review. 2022;(4):66-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20333/25000136-2022-4-66-72
Review
For citations:
Kantsurova M.R., Rymashevsky A.N., Sapronova N.G., Kaushanskaya L.V., Volkov A.E., Myshanskaya E.E., Veretennikova V.V. Compression hemostatic sutures in obstetrics: from history to modernity. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2026;17(2):24-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2026-17-2-24-30
JATS XML































