Features of selection of anticoagulant therapy in patients with critical ischemia of lower extremities after reconstructive operations
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2018-9-2-43-50
Abstract
Objective: to improve the results of treatment of patients with obliterating atherosclerosis with critical ischemia of the lower extremities by individual selection of anticoagulant therapy for the prevention of thrombosis aft er reconstructive surgery on the arteries of the lower extremities. Materials and methods: 82 patients were divided into 2 groups: 1 group (48 patients) - reconstructive surgery on the arteries of the lower extremities and anticoagulant therapy under the control of the coagulogram. 2 group (34 patients) - reconstructive operations with the selection of anticoagulant therapy with the help of hemostasiogram indicators and the T-2 thrombodynamics test. Results: Out of 48 patients in the 1 study group, a good eff ect was observed in 36 patients (75.00%), in 9 (18.75%) - satisfactory, and in 3 cases (6.25%) - unsatisfactory. In the 2nd group: good results - 33 (97.06%) patients, and in 1 (2.94%) patients - satisfactory. Unsatisfactory results were not. Th e number of repeated operations within 1 year, performed in the 1st group, was statistically signifi cantly 2 times greater than in the second group. All the second operations are associated with the development of thrombotic complications. With a combination of the majority of hemostasiogram and «Trombodynamics T-2» tests, the dose of heparin therapy was adjusted, increasing by 2500 units, i.е. the patient received 7500ED 4 p / day. If during the «T-2 thrombodynamics» and coagulogram on the 6th day aft er surgery, hypercoagulation was determined, then the dose of heparin increased again by 2500 units. Conclusions: Comparative analysis of hemostasiogram indices in the fi rst hours aft er the performed operative treatment is not very useful for predicting the frequency of thrombotic complications, while 6 days aft er operative treatment it indicates the presence of statistically signifi cant diff erences between the two study groups. Th at indicates a more adequate selection of a dose of heparin in the second group.
About the Authors
I. I. KatelnitskyRussian Federation
Ivan I. Katelnitsky, MD, Prof., Head of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 1.
Rostovon-Don.
Igor I. Katelnitsky
Igor I. Katelnitsky, MD, Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases №1.
Rostovon-Don.
E. S. Livadnyaya
Ekaterina S. Livadnyaya, post-graduate student of the Department of Surgical Diseases №1.
Rostovon-Don.
References
1. Boldin BV, Rodionov SV, Golosnitsky PYu, Turkin PYu, Varich GA, Lisenkov OP et al. Risk factors of early occlusions of reconstructed arterial segments in patients with lower extremity arterial diseas. Lechebnoe delo. 2015;(4):90-96. (In Russ).
2. Lazarenko VA, Bobrovskaya EA, Parfenov EI. Chastota trombozov zony rekonstruktsii posle op-erativnogo vmeshatel’stva na bryushnoi aorte i arteriyakh nizhnikh konechnostei v zavisimosti ot vida operatsii. Universitetskaya nauka: vzglyad v budushchee: materialy mezhdunar. nauch. - prakt. konf., posvyashch. 81-letiyu Kurskogo GMU i 50-letiyu farm. fakul’teta. V 3-kh tomakh. Kursk; 2016. (In Russ).
3. Bedenis R, Lethaby A, Maxwell H, Acosta S, Prins MH. Antiplatelet agents for preventing throm-bosis aft er peripheral arterial bypass surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(2):CD000535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000535.pub3.
4. Kovalenko VI, Temrezov MB, Klimovich LG, Borsov MKh. Risk factors for thrombotic events in patients with critical lower extremity ischemia. Rossiiskii Meditsinskii Zhurnal. 2014;(1):34-37. (In Russ).
5. Lipets EN, Ataullakhanov FI, Panteleev MA. Integrated laboratory coagulation tests in hyperco-agulation diagnosis and thrombosis risk assessment. Part II. Th e sensitivity of integral tests to hy-percoagulable states. Oncohematology. 2015;10(3):78-91. (In Russ.) doi:10.17650/1818-8346-201510-3-78-91.
6. Momot A, Taranenko I, Tsyvkina L, Semenova N, Molchanova I. Th e risk factors of thrombogenic, thrombophilia, and the principle for heparin prophylaxis in personalized medicine. Anticoagulation therapy. 2016. doi: 10.5772/64118
7. Hoff man M. Heparins: Clinical use and laboratory monitoring. Lab Med. 2010;41(10):621-626. doi: 10.1309/lmsxwc3a4lbijp2b.
8. Casu B, Naggi A, Torri G. Re-visiting the structure of heparin. Carbohydr Res. 2015;403:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j. carres.2014.06.023
9. Clagett GP, Sobel M, Jackson MR, Lip G.Y.H, Tangelder M, Verhaeghe R. Antithrombotic therapy in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Chest. 2004;126(3):609S–626S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.609s.
10. Harter K, Levine M, Henderson SO. Anticoagulation drug therapy: a review. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(1):11-17. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.12.22933
Review
For citations:
Katelnitsky I.I., Katelnitsky I.I., Livadnyaya E.S. Features of selection of anticoagulant therapy in patients with critical ischemia of lower extremities after reconstructive operations. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2018;9(2):43-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2018-9-2-43-50