Preview

Medical Herald of the South of Russia

Advanced search

THE ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR PACING LEADS IMPLANTATION AND EXTRACTION

https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2017-8-3-86-92

Abstract

Analysingthe example of unusual case of a successful direct constant His bundle pacing, we would like to draw specialist’s attention to details of procedure and some important electrophysiological particularities we have come across during operation. Long-term (7 years) results ( pacing options, ECG data, changes of left ventricle ejection fraction and patient’s quality of life) were considered too.

About the Authors

A. V. Ponomarev
Rostov Urgent Hospital N2
Russian Federation
Alexandr V. Ponomarev — Head of Endovascular department


D. V. Safonov
Taganrog Urgent Hospital
Russian Federation
Dmitriy V. Safonov — PhD, Head of Taganrog Urgent Hospital


F. V. Sklyarov
Rostov Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Fedor V. Sklyarov — Head of Arrithmology department


G. V. Chudinov
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation
Georgiy V. Chudinov — PhD, MD, associated professor


N. A. Peskov
Rostov Urgent Hospital N2
Russian Federation
Nicolay A. Peskov – Doctor of Endovascular department of Rostov Urgent


A. A. Tatyanchenko
Rostov Urgent Hospital N2
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Tatyanchenko — Doctor of Endovascular department


V. V. Korshunov
Rostov Urgent Hospital N2
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav V. Korshunov — Doctor of Endovascular department


References

1. Chudinov GV. Lead extraction at cardiovascular implantable electronic devices practice. Saarbrucken, Deutschland: LAP; 2013.

2. Correa de Sa D, Hardin NJ, Crespo EM, Nicholas KB, Lustgarten DL. Autopsy analysis of the implantation site of a permanent selective direct His-bundle pacing lead. CircArrhythmElectrophysiol. 2012;5(1):244-246. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.968834

3. Sweeney MO, Prinzen FW. A new paradigm for physiologic ventricular pacing. J Am CollCardiol. 2006;47(2):282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.029

4. Victor F, Mabo P, Mansour H, Pavin D, Kabalu G, de Place C, et al. A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results. J CardiovascElectrophysiol. 2006;17(3);238–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00358.x

5. De Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk J. Comparison of the haemodynamic eff ects of right ventricular outfl ow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacinga quantitative review. Europace. 2003;5(3):275-278.

6. Yee R, Klein GJ, Krahn AC, Skanes AC. Selective site pacing: tools and training. PacingClinElectrophysiol. 2004;27:894–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00553.x

7. Occhetta E, Bortnik M, Magnani A, Francalacci G, Piccinino C, Plebani L, et al. Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing aft er atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing. J AmCollCardiol. 2006;47(10):1938–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.056

8. Deshmukh P, Casavant DA, Romanyshyn M, Anderson K. Permanent, direct His-bundle pacing: a novel approach to cardiac pacing in patients with normal His-Purkinje activation. Circulation. 2000;101(8):869–77.

9. Deshmukh P, Romanyshyn M. Direct His-bundle pacing: present and future. Pacing ClinElectrophysiol. 2004;27:862870. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00548.x


Review

For citations:


Ponomarev A.V., Safonov D.V., Sklyarov F.V., Chudinov G.V., Peskov N.A., Tatyanchenko A.A., Korshunov V.V. THE ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR PACING LEADS IMPLANTATION AND EXTRACTION. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2017;8(3):86-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2017-8-3-86-92

Views: 883


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2219-8075 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7876 (Online)