Preview

Medical Herald of the South of Russia

Advanced search

DIAGNOSTIC MARKERS OF ACUTE CHOLANGITIS IN BILIARY PANCREATITIS IN PATIENTS WITH IMPACTED STONES OF THE MAJOR DUODENAL PAPILLA

https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2017-8-3-64-70

Abstract

Purpose: оbjectivize the diagnostic criteria of acute cholangitis in acute obturational biliary pancreatitis.

Materials and methods: a retrospective analysis of the treatment of 90 patients with a wounded OBD stone after ECST was performed. To diagnose and assess the severity of acute cholangitis in the preoperative period, the diagnostic criteria of theTokyo classification of 2013 (TG13) were used. Endoscopic diagnosis of acute cholangitis was established during ESTT in visual assessment of bile, the presence of edema, hyperemia, fibrin deposits in the distal bile duct. A comparative analysis of laboratory-instrumental parameters before and aft er EPST in patients with acute cholangitis depending on the degree of severity according to TG13, and in patients with or without endoscopic signs of cholangitis was performed

Results: according to TG13, acute cholangitis was diagnosed in all patients. An easy degree was established in 31 patients (34.4%), moderate in 53 (58.9%), severe in 6 (6.7%). Th e markers of systemic infl ammation had an upward character depending on the degree of severity of the cholangitis, the tendency of decrease and the normalization time aft er EPST directly correlated with the initial parameters in the groups (r = 0.728, p = 0.000). Laboratory indices of cholestasis were of an upward character in patients with mild to moderate cholangitis, which was refl ected both in the ultrasoundographic imaging of the bile ducts upon admission and in the data of cholangiography with EPST (p <0.05). Th e levels of transaminase and amylase did not have statistically significant diff erences (p> 0.05).Endoscopic signs of cholangitis were revealed in 44 (48.9%) patients. When comparing the ratio between patients who had endoscopic cholangitis signs and severity, according to TG13, in 11 (35.5%) acute cholangitis was classified as easy, in 30 (56.6%) as average, in 3 (6.8%) as (P = 0.174) and the correlation between endoscopic signs and severity of cholangitis was not noted (r = 0.162 p = 0.126). In the comparative analysis of laboratory-instrumental parameters of patients, no statistically significant diff erences were found (p> 0.05), depending on the presence or absence of endoscopic signs of cholangitis.

Conclusions: diagnostic criteria of acute cholangitis TG13 are applicable for the preliminary diagnosis of acute cholangitis in conditions of acute biliary pancreatitis and can serve as an indication for a timely EPST.

About the Authors

S. H. Mamedov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Serdar H. Mamedov, graduate student of the Department of Faculty Surgery


A. E. Klimov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Aleksey E. Klimov, Head of the Department of Faculty Surgery, Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences,


D. T. Nazarov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Daler T. Nazarov, graduate student of the Department of Faculty Surgery


Е. Yu. Sadovnikova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Elena Yu. Sadovnikova, graduate student of the Department of Faculty Surgery


References

1. Mikhailusov SV, Moiseenkova EV, Misrokov MM. The stone of the papilla of Vater and acute pancreatitis. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2015;20(1): 90-95. (in Russ.)

2. Kondratenko PG, Stukalo AA. Mini-invasive techniques in patients with acute obstruction of the terminal part of common bile duct. Ukrainskii zhurnal khirurgii. 2013;3. (In Russ). Available from: http://www.mif-ua.com/archive/article/36667/

3. Takano Y, Nagahama M, Maruoka N, Yamamura E. Clinical features of gallstone impaction at the ampulla of Vater and the eff ectiveness of endoscopic biliary drainage without papillotomy. Endosc Int Open. 2016; 04(07): 806 – 811 doi: 10.1055/s-0042-109265

4. Lerch M, Aghdassi Ali. Gallstone-related pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis. Pancreapedia: Exocrine Pancreas Knowledge Base[Internet]. 2016. Available from:: http:// dx.doi.org/10.3998/panc.2016.24 doi: 10.3998/panc.2016.24

5. Meireles LC, Coutinho AP, Lagos AC, Canena JM, Neves BC. Endoscopic visualization of impacted bile duct stone at duodenal papilla. GE J Port Gastrenterol. 2013;20(6):282-283 doi: 10.1016/j.jpg.2013.05.003

6. Parfenov IP et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis. Rossiiskii medsiinskii zhurnal. 2012;1:20-21. (in Russ.)

7. Lee TH, Park DH. Endoscopic prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(44): 16582–16595. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16582

8. Yin HK, Wu HE, Li QX, Wang W, Ou WL, Xia HH. Pancreatic Stenting Reduces Post-ERCP Pancreatitis and Biliary Sepsis in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Study. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2016;2016:а9687052. doi:10.1155/2016/9687052

9. Shapoval’yants SG, Fedorov ED, Budzinskii SA, Kotieva AY. Stenting of the pancreatic duct in the treatment of acute pancreatitis aft er endoscopic transpapillary interventions. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2014; 19:17–27. (In Russ).

10. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS. American college of gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1400-1415. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218.

11. Yokoe M, Takada T, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Isaji S, Wada K, et al. Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2015; 22: 405–432. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.259.

12. Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/ APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013;13:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063.

13. Surlin V, Saft oiu A, Dumitrescu D. Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(44): 16544-16549. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544

14. Russian clinical recommendations: Diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis. Shkola khirurgii ROKh. 2015;4-21 (in Russ.)

15. Dubravcsik Z, Madаcsy L, Gyоkeres T, Vincze А, Szepes Z, Hegyi P, Szepes A. Preventive pancreatic stents in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis (PREPAST trial): Prestudy protocol for a multicenter, prospective, randomized, interventional, controlled trial. Pancreatology. 2014; 15(2): 115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.02.007

16. Mayumi T., Someya K., Ootubo H., Takama T., Kido T., Kamezaki F., et al. Progression of Tokyo Guidelines and Japanese Guidelines for Management of Acute Cholangitis and Cholecystitis. J UOEH. 2013;35(4):249-257. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.35.249.

17. Kiriyama S, Takada T, Strasberg SM. TG13 guidelines for diagnosis and severity grading of acute cholangitis. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2013; 20:24–34. doi:10.1007/s00534012-0561-3

18. Beltsis A, Kapetano D. Early ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis: 20 years of dispute. Annals of gastroenterology. 2010; 23(1): 27-30 (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Mamedov S.H., Klimov A.E., Nazarov D.T., Sadovnikova Е.Yu. DIAGNOSTIC MARKERS OF ACUTE CHOLANGITIS IN BILIARY PANCREATITIS IN PATIENTS WITH IMPACTED STONES OF THE MAJOR DUODENAL PAPILLA. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2017;8(3):64-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2017-8-3-64-70

Views: 788


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2219-8075 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7876 (Online)