ANALYSIS OF OPTIONS FOR THE INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2016-3-22-26
Abstract
Purpose: to compare the depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic reactions during general anesthesia for caesarean section.
Materials and Methods: 45 pregnant women scheduled for caesarean section under general anesthesia were enrolled. All patients were divided into 3 groups (15 patients in each), depending on the general anesthetics. In the 1st group used sodium thiopental 5 mg / kg, in the 2nd sodium thiopental 5 mg / kg with sevoflurane (0.5 MAC), 3rd propofol 2.5 mg / kg. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and index of AAI were estimated at six basic stages of the operation.
Results: the highest rates of mean arterial pressure and AAI index were observed in the first group.
Summary: the use of a mixture of thiopental sodium dose of 5 mg/kg with sevoflurane (0.5 MAC) or propofol dose of 2.5 mg / kg provide a sufficient surgical level of depth of anesthesia in the main stages of the operation; allow minimize hypertensive response for intubation and surgical trauma in comparison with the thiopental sodium dose of 5 mg/kg.
About the Authors
A. N. BiryukovRussian Federation
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Competing Interests: Потенциальные и явные конфликты интересов, связанные с рукописью, отсутствуют
A. V. Schegolev
Russian Federation
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Competing Interests: Потенциальные и явные конфликты интересов, связанные с рукописью, отсутствуют
E. N. Ershov
Russian Federation
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Competing Interests: Потенциальные и явные конфликты интересов, связанные с рукописью, отсутствуют
A. V. Panteleev
Russian Federation
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Competing Interests: Потенциальные и явные конфликты интересов, связанные с рукописью, отсутствуют
A. A. Andreenko
Russian Federation
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Competing Interests: Потенциальные и явные конфликты интересов, связанные с рукописью, отсутствуют
References
1. Lumbiganon, P. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. / P.Lumbiganon, M.Laopaiboon, A.M.Gulmezoglu et al. // Lancet. – 2010. – №375. – P.490-499.
2. WHO. World health statistics 2010 // P.88-95.
3. Guasch, E. General anaesthesia and obstetric bleeding in caesarean section. One year's experience in a university hospital. / E.Guasch, P.Montenegro, C.Ochoa et al. // Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Reanim. – 2012. – Vol.59, №8. – P.415-422.
4. Kinsella, S.M. A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 Caesarean sections. / S.M.Kinsella // Anaesthesia. – 2008. – Vol.63, №8. – P.822-832.
5. Полушин, Ю.С. Мифы и реалии обезболивания родов. / Ю.С.Полушин, Э.К.Айламазян, А.Г.Киселев и др.// Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. – 2011. – № 3. – С.10-17.
6. Obstetric Anesthesia: Handbook. / S.Datta, B.S.Kodali, S.Segal. – NY., 2010. – P.180-200.
7. Грицан, А.И., Оценка качества низкопоточной анестезии на основе севофлюрана при абдоминальном родоразрешении. / А.И.Грицан, Г.В.Грицан, Е.Н.Сивков // Хирургия. Журнал им Н.И. Пирогова. – 2009. – №1. – С.56–59.
8. Allahyary, E. Evaluation of the adequacy of general anesthesia in cesarean section by auditory evoked potential index: an observational study. / E.Allahyary, F.Zand, H.R.Tabatabaee // Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica – 2008. – Vol.46, №1 – P.16-24.
Review
For citations:
Biryukov A.N., Schegolev A.V., Ershov E.N., Panteleev A.V., Andreenko A.A. ANALYSIS OF OPTIONS FOR THE INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2016;(3):22-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2016-3-22-26