INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE IMMUNOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS IN CONTACTS OF THE CENTERS OF TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2015-3-116-119
Abstract
Purpose: comparative estimation of the efficacy of Mantoux test with 2 TE PPD-L, DiaskintestR, and QuantiFERONRTBGoldfor identification of active and latent tuberculosis infection at contact persons.
Materials and Мethods: the study included 220 people from tuberculosis infection foci. All contact persons underwent the Mantoux test with 2 TE PPD-L and the DiaskintestR. The in vitro QuantiFERONRTBGold test was done before the intracutaneous probes. The statistical manipulation of the obtained data was performed using the Statistica 6.0 package under Windows XP.
Results: the Mantoux test with 2 TE PPD-L was reliably not distinguished for persons with active tuberculosis, residual posttuberculosis changes, and latent tuberculosis infections. DiaskintestR and QuantiFERONRTBGold possessed statistically significant differences depending on the investigated group.
Summary: the Mantoux test with 2 TE PPD-L has low sensitivity and specificity, and not effective enough to detect active and latent tuberculosis infection. The usage of DiaskintestR and QuantiFERONRTBGold allows to detect and identify tuberculosis infection both active and latent.
About the Authors
L. A. Shovkun
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of tuberculosis
Russian Federation
Department of tuberculosis
I. M. Franchuk
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of tuberculosis
Russian Federation
Department of tuberculosis
Ye. D. Kampos
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of tuberculosis
Russian Federation
Department of tuberculosis
A. V. Konstantinova
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of tuberculosis
Russian Federation
Department of tuberculosis
O. V. Ilyina
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of tuberculosis
Russian Federation
Department of tuberculosis
References
1. EuroTB. Surveillance of tuberculosis in Europe: report on tuberculosis cases notified in 2003. Saint-Maurice, Institut de Veille Sanitaire, 2005 (http://www.eurotb.org/rapporst_2003.htm, accessed 7 August 2006).
2. Global tuberculosis control: surveillance, planning, financing.Geneva, WHO, 2006 (WHO/HTM/2006.3263. Шилова М.В. Эпидемическая обстановка по туберкулезу в Российской Федерации к началу 2009 г. // Туберкулез и болезни органов дыхания. – 2010. - № 5 – с. 14-21
3. Мордык А.В., Пузырева Л.В. Заболеваемость туберкулёзом контактных лиц в очагах туберкулёзной инфекции на территории Омской области // Сибирское медицинское обозрение. – 2013. - № 5. – с. 52-55
4. Корначев А.С., Семина Н.А., Голубев Д.Н. Роль современных факторов в эпидемическом процессе туберкулёза в России // Эпидемиология и вакцинопрофилактика – 2007. - № 1 – с. 16-2
5. Федеральный закон № 77-ФЗ ≪О предупреждении распространения туберкулеза в Российской Федерации≫ от 18.06.2001 г.
6. Кожная проба с препаратом ≪Диаскинтест≫ – новые возможности идентификации туберкулезной инфекции. Под ред. М.А. Пальцева. Москва, ≪Медицина≫, 2010, С.14.
7. Медников Б.Л., Слогоцкая Л.В. Кожная проба с препаратом ДИАСКИНТЕСТR (аллерген туберкулезный рекомбинантный 0,2 мкг в 0,1 мл раствор для внутрикожного введения) для идентификации туберкулезной инфекции. Пособие для врачей. Москва, 2009, 28 с.
8. Приказ Министерства Здравоохранения № 951 от 29.12.2014 года ≪Об утверждении методических рекомендаций по совершенствованию диагностики и лечения туберкулёза органов дыхания≫
Review
For citations:
Shovkun L.A., Franchuk I.M., Kampos Ye.D., Konstantinova A.V., Ilyina O.V. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE IMMUNOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS IN CONTACTS OF THE CENTERS OF TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2015;(3):116-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2015-3-116-119
Views:
445
Email this article 