COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RECURRENT EPITHELIZED PILONIDAL SINUS AND SACROCOCCYGEALFISTULAS TREATMENT
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2015-4-60-63
Abstract
Purpose: to improve the results of surgical treatment in patients with epithelized pilonidal sinus (EPS) by developing and incalcating an effective surgical method comprising measures for preventing recurrence.
Materials and methods: 60 patients with EPS and sacrococcygeal fistulas have been operated, of the total number of 60,in 22 patients EPS excision was followed by suturing the wound edges to the bottom; in 10 patients the wounds were left open, in 9 excision supplemented bywound defect plastics with displaced non-free skin flaps in the developed modifications.The choice of operation method depended on the extent of the inflammatory process, duration of the disease, a history of recurrence.
Results: 3 cases of recurrence (30%) were registered in the I group of patients; 7 cases of recurrence(31,8%) – in the II group; 4 cases of recurrence (44., %) – in the III group; 3 cases of recurrence (15,8 %) - in the IV group.
Conclusion: radical surgery with simultaneous closure of the surgical wound with non-free skin flapsare the most promising for improving long-term results in EPS treatment (including recurrent fistulas), as evidenced by the immediate and long-term results.
Key words: epithelized pilonidal sinus, plastic counter flaps, pilonidal cyst, suppuration, recurrence.
About the Authors
Z. K. Magomedova
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of Surgical Diseases №2
Russian Federation
Department of Surgical Diseases №2
E. V. Chernyshova
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of Surgical Diseases №2
Russian Federation
Department of Surgical Diseases №2
V. S. Groshilin
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation
Department of Surgical Diseases №2
Russian Federation
Department of Surgical Diseases №2
References
1. Sullivan D.J., Brooks D.C., Breen E. Interglutealpilonidaldisease: clinical, manifestations and diagnosis [Электронный ресурс] // Evidanse-Based Clinical Decision Support at the Point of Care. URL: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/intergluteal- pilonidal-disease-clinical-manifestations-and-diagnosis/ contributors?UtdPopup=true (дата обращения: 12.11.2013)
2. Karydakis G. E. Easy and successful treatment ofpilonidalsinusafterexplanationofitscausativeprocess / G. E. Karydakis // Aust. N. Z. J. Surg,-1992. – Vol. 62. – P. 385–389
3. Воробьёв, Г.И. Основы колопроктологии / Г.И. Воробьёв // М., 2006. 240 с.
4. Ривкин, В.Л. Руководство по колопроктологии / В.Л. Ривкин, A.C. Бронштейн, С.Н. Файн // М1: Медицина, 2001. 168 с.
5. Коплатадзе А.М; Сравнительная оценка различных методов хирургического лечения эпителиального копчикового хода / A.M. Коплатадзе, С.Д. Ким // Колопроктология. 2009. - № 2. - С. 8-10.
6. Денисенко, В. Л. Оптимизация лечения эпи-телиального копчикового хода, осложненного абсцессом / В. Л. Денисенко // Новости хирур-гии. – 2008. – Т. 16, № 1. – С. 55–61.
7. Лаврешин, П. М. Способ хирургического лече-ния эпителиального копчикового хода, ослож-ненного множественными свищами / П. М. Лав-решин, В. К. Гобеджишвили [и др.] // Вестник хирургии им. И. И. Грекова. – 2007. – Т. 166, № 4. – С. 63–65.
8. Помазкин, В. И. Выбор операции для лечения больных с эпителиальным копчиковым ходом / В. И. Помазкин, Ю. В. Мансуров // Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова.- 2008. Т. 167. - № 1. - С. 85-87.
9. Карташев, A.A. Способ хирургического лечения больных эпителиальным копчиковым ходом / A.A. Карташев, А.Л. Чарышкин, Е.Г. Евтушенко // Хирург - М.- 2011,- №1,- С.3-5.
10. Карташев, A.A. Анализ послеоперационных осложнений после иссечения эпителиального копчикового хода / A.A. Карташев, A.B. Смолькина // Приложение к научнотеоретическому журналу “Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета” серия 11 медицина, 2010, С. 757.
Review
For citations:
Magomedova Z.K., Chernyshova E.V., Groshilin V.S. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RECURRENT EPITHELIZED PILONIDAL SINUS AND SACROCOCCYGEALFISTULAS TREATMENT. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2015;(4):60-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2015-4-60-63
Views:
500
Email this article 