Fixed drug eruption caused by fluconazole
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2023-14-4-11-16
Abstract
Objective: to characterize a group of patients with fixed drug erythema (FDE) caused by fluconazole to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the local provocative application test (LPAT) and to evaluate cross-allergenic reactivity with other antifungal drugs of the azole group.
Materials and methods: a prospective study was conducted in the period from 2012 to 2022. 347 patients with delayed drug hypersensitivity (DDH) were consulted, FDE could be suspected in 86 patients (24.8%), of which 23 patients were caused by fluconazole (26.8%). We included patients with suspected fluconazole FDE (n=23). LPAT with fluconazole was performed in 12 patients, drug provocation test (DPT) with ketoconazole – 17, DPT with itraconazole – 15, DPT with fluconazole – 1.
Results: the ratio of men and women was 1:6.3, the average age was 30.39±10.23 years. In 1 patient, the diagnosis of FDE caused by fluconazole was withdrawn. Number of reactions: 1 – in 2 patients (9.1%), more than one reaction – in 20 (90.9%). 4 patients (18.2%) had atopy. Sensitivity of LPAT for diagnosing DDH in FDE caused by fluconazole was 41.7%, specificity – 100%, false-negative rate – 58.3%, positive predictive value – 100%. DPT with ketoconazole, itraconazole was negative in 100% of cases.
Conclusions: the results obtained allow us to conclude that FDE caused by fluconazole in the vast majority of cases developed in women aged 19 to 30 years. Since patients with FDE caused by fluconazole tolerate ketoconazole and itraconazole well, it is highly likely that they can switch from fluconazole to one of these drugs. LPAT should be used for diagnosing FDE caused by fluconazole, since it was absolutely safe for the patient and allowed avoiding DPT in 42% of patients. Importantly that the timely and correct diagnosis in more than 90% of cases, it was possible to prevent the development of a repeated reaction to fluconazole.
About the Authors
T. N. MyasnikovaRussian Federation
Tatiana N. Myasnikova – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Associate, Аllergis
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest
T. V. Latysheva
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Latysheva, Professor – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Нead of the intensive care unit
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest
T. S. Romanova
Russian Federation
Tatiana S. Romanova – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Аllergis
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest
V. V. Smirnov
Russian Federation
Valerii V. Smirnov – Dr. Sci. (Pharm.), Head of research and production complex
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest
References
1. Patel S, John AM, Handler MZ, Schwartz RA. Fixed Drug Eruptions: An Update, Emphasizing the Potentially Lethal Generalized Bullous Fixed Drug Eruption. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(3):393–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-020-00505-3
2. Brockow K, Ardern-Jones MR, Mockenhaupt M, Aberer W, Barbaud A, et al. EAACI position paper on how to classify cutaneous manifestations of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;74(1):14–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13562
3. Bavbek S, Yilmaz I, Sözener ZÇ. Fixed drug eruption caused by ornidazole and fluconazole but not isoconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole and metronidazole. J Dermatol. 2013;40(2):134–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.12023
4. Mithari HS, Gole PV., Kharkar VD, Mahajan SA. Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption to fluconazole; with cross-reactivity to tinidazole. Indian J Dermatol. 2019;64(4):335–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_431_18
5. Makris M, Fokoloros C, Syrmali A, Tsakiraki Z, Damaskou V, Papadavid E. Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption to fluconazole with positive patch testing and confirmed tolerance to itraconazole. Iran J Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2021;20(2):255–8. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijaai.v20i2.6081
6. Demir S, Cetin EA, Unal D, Coşkun R, Olgac M, et al. Generalized Fixed Drug Eruption Induced by Fluconazole Without Cross-Reactivity to Itraconazole: Lymphocyte Transformation Test Confirms the Diagnosis. Drug Saf - Case Reports. 2018;5(1):2–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40800-017-0067-7
7. Gupta R, Thami GP. Fixed drug eruption caused by itraconazole: reactivity and cross reactivity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:521–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2006.06.013
8. Quint T, Wöhrl S, Kinaciyan T. Fixed drug eruption caused by fluconazole—An underdiagnosed but recurrent problem. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80(3):172–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13149
9. Tavallaee M, Rad MM. Fixed drug eruption resulting from fluconazole use: A case report. J Med Case Rep. 2009;3:1–4. https://doi.org/10.4076/1752-1947-3-7368
10. Saliba E, Chrabieh R, Tannous Z. Fluconazole-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;39:254.e5-254.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.061
11. Adler NR, Lin MJ, Cameron R, Gin D. Fluconazole-induced Sweet’s syndrome: A novel association. Australas J Dermatol. 2018;59(2):160–1. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12709
12. Barbaud A, Gonçalo M, Bruynzeel D, Bircher A. Guidelines for performing skin tests with drugs in the investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45(6):321–8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450601.x
Review
For citations:
Myasnikova T.N., Latysheva T.V., Romanova T.S., Smirnov V.V. Fixed drug eruption caused by fluconazole. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2023;14(4):11-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2023-14-4-11-16