EPISIOTOMY AS ONE OF THE PROBLEMS OF MODERN PERINIOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2020-11-1-27-33
Abstract
Objective: the study is to determine the effectiveness of EEG-biofeedback training on β-rhythm for correcting voluntary attention in children 6 – 8 years of age with the consequences of perinatal CNS lesions of hypoxic-ischemic genesis.
Materials and methods: a total of 120 children aged 6 – 8 years who included 30 children with cerebrastenic syndrome (I group) were examined; 58 children with hyperactivity and attention deficit syndrome (II group); 32 children with cerebral palsy, spastic diplegia (III group). EEG-biofeedback training on β-rhythm correction was carried out in an amount of 15 sessions lasting 20 – 30 minutes on the Kinesis machine (Neurot, Russia). Before and after the biofeedback therapy, a psychodiagnostic evaluation of the functions of voluntary attention on the Toulouse-Pieron scale was carried out (in the adaptation of LA Yasyukova, 2001). EEG recording was performed on an EEG 21/26 encephalograph Encephalan-131-03, modification 10 (Manufacturer: NPKF Medikom MTD, Russia). For statistical analysis of the obtained indicators before and after treatment, the significance criterion was used to compare the two proportions (fractions) under the assumption that the variables are distributed according to the normal law (package STATISTICS 6.0).
Results: the effectiveness of EEG-biofeedback training on β-rhythm correction was revealed, as evidenced by a significant decrease in the number of children with isolated types of attention disorders in all groups of patients as well as with mixed disorders in the II group.
Conclusion: аctivation of cortical processes, increasing the level of attention, memory and cognitive abilities of the psyche, when EEG-biofeedback training is included in the therapy complex, depend on the nature and severity of central nervous system lesions in children with various nosological forms of neurological pathology, which requires rethinking of therapeutic complex methods of correction and selection of personalized biofeedback training protocols, taking into account data on various types of metabolic and neurophysiological abnormalities in the head in children with different nosological forms of neurological disorders.
About the Authors
S. B. BerezhanskayaRussian Federation
Sofya B. Berezhanskaya — Dr. Sci. (Med.), prof., Chief Researcher, Pediatric Department.
Rostov-on-Don
N. N. Vostrykh
Russian Federation
Natalya N. Vostrykh — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of Department of Young Children.
Rostov-on-Don
A. N. Golota
Russian Federation
Anna N. Golota — Medical Psychologist, Department of Young Children.
Rostov-on-Don
D. I. Sozaeva
Russian Federation
Diana Iz. Sozaeva — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Researcher, Pediatric Department.
Rostov-on-Don
M. Y. Krynochkina
Russian Federation
Marina Yur. Krynochkina — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of functional diagnostics; Research Institute of Obstetrics and Pediatrics.
Rostov-on-Don
I. G. Loginova
Russian Federation
Irina G. Loginova — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Deputy Chief Physician for Pediatrics, pediatric department.
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Zavadenko N.N., Subbotina N.YU. Attention deficit hyperactive disorder: finding optimal approaches to diagnosis and treatment. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya v nevrologii i psikhiatrii. 2010;(18):34-39. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 21737210
2. Lavrik S.Yu., Domitrak S.V., Shprakh V.V. Minimal brain dysfunction. Irkutsk; 2013. (In Russ.)
3. Zavadenko N.N. Hyperactivity and attention deficit in childhood. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.)
4. Kleshchenko E.I., Shimshenko E.V. Specifics of psychomotor development in children with different outcomes of perinatal hypoxic brain injury. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2019; 26(3): 48-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-62282019-26-3-48-54
5. Аfonin А.А., Pavlenko G.V., Nemchenko E.V., Аfonina T.А., Prometnoj D.V., et al. Perinatal lesions of the central nervous system: clinic, diagnosis, treatment. Rostov-na-Donu: OOO «АRTMarket»; 2013. (in Russ.)
6. Sozaeva D.I., Berezhanskay S.B. The basic mechanisms of interaction nervous and immune systems.clinico-experimental data. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2014;(3):145-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2014-3-145-150
7. Sozaeva D.I., Berezhanskay S.B. Pathogenetic mechanisms of the formation of cerebral disorders in young children who underwent hypoxia in the perinatal period. Modern problems of science and education. 2014;4:329. (in Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 22285656
8. Lavrik S.Iu., Domitrak S.V., Shprakh V.V. Correction of central nervous system energy processes in children with the minimal cerebral dysfunction. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2011;111(4):37-41. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 16597327
9. Lukyanova E.A, Berezhanskaya S.B, Todorova A.S. Peculiarities of adaptation of the cardiovascular system in newborns with hypoxic-ischemic damage of the central nervous system. Modern problems of science and education. 2019;(3):140. (in Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 38732542
10. Fedorenko E.V. Application of the method with biofeedback in primary school children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2013;(8):30-32. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 20152797
11. Surushkina S.YU., T.I. Аnisimova. Application of electroencephalographic biofeedback (EEG – BOS) in the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases in children. TERRA MEDICA NOVA. 2009;(3):47–48. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 16371014
12. Jafarova O.A, Danilenko E.N. Neuromyopathies in the correction of attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity in schoolchildren. Otkrytoe obrazovanie. 2016;20(2):93-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2016-2-93-96
13. Demin D.B., Poskotinova L.V. Physiological basis of the functional biofeedback methods. Human Ecology (Russian Federation). 2014;(9):48-59. (in Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 21982405
14. Sineva N.А. Application of biofeedback technology in the treatment of children with speech disorders in a children’s city clinic. Zdravookhranenie YUgry: opyt i innovatsii. 2015;(3):38-40. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 25138761
15. Barshai V.M., Rybkina T.A. Biological feedback using for correction of psychoemotical state. Tavricheskij nauchnyj obozrevatel. 2017;(10-2):6-12. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 32472820
16. Yasyukova L.А. Optimization of the learning and development of children with minimal brain dysfunction: guide. - St. Petersburg: Imaton; 2007. (in Russ.)
17. Luders H, Noachtar S, eds. //Atlas and Classification of Electroencephalography. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000
18. Lavrik S.Yu., Domitrak S.V., Shprakh V.V. Minimal cerebral dysfunction: prevalence, risk factors, clinical, neurophysiological and neuropsychophysiological aspects. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2014;(1):35-39. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 21699833
19. Sherlin L., Arns M., Lubar J., Sokhadze E. A Reply to Lofthouse, Arnold, and Hurt. Journal of Neurotherapy. 2010;14:307-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10874208.2010.523350
Review
For citations:
Berezhanskaya S.B., Vostrykh N.N., Golota A.N., Sozaeva D.I., Krynochkina M.Y., Loginova I.G. EPISIOTOMY AS ONE OF THE PROBLEMS OF MODERN PERINIOLOGY. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2020;11(1):27-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2020-11-1-27-33