PREVENTION OF MUCOSAL PERFORATION OF THE BOTTOM OF THE MAXILLARY SINUS WITH AN OPEN SINUS LIFTING DUE TO THE SIMULTANEOUS CONDUCTION OF ENDONASAL INTERVENTIONS ON THE MAXILLARY SINUS
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2015-3-82-85
Abstract
Purpose: to develop a system optimization sinus-lifting in diseases of the maxillary sinus by a one-step fix pathology sine and implementation of an open sinus lifting.
Materials and methods: 22 patients of the main group moved through the operation of an open sinus lift directly after prior endoscopic interventions on the maxillary sinus. 20 patients endonasal intervention on the maxillary sinus was performed for 2-6 months to open sinus lift. Comparing the results of different approaches to dental and endonasal procedures.
Results: domaintest perform dental and endonasal surgery is possible to eliminate the perforation membrane in the main group. In the control group this complication was detected in 3 (15%) patients. In the control group after sinus thickening of the mucous membrane of the maxillary sinus was observed in a larger number of patients (45% and 14,3%), the total duration of the two stages of the stationary period was almost 2 times longer with 3 times lengthened the period from surgical intervention to dental implantation.
Summary: domaintest perform dental and endonasal interventions with an open sinus lift, allows prevent perforation of the lining of the bottom of the maxillary sinus.
About the Authors
S. Ju. MaksjukovRussian Federation
Department of Stomatology № 2
D. S. Shhepljakov
Russian Federation
Department of Stomatology № 2
A. V. Borzilov
Russian Federation
Department of Stomatology № 2
E. S. Kozhemjakina
Russian Federation
Department of Stomatology № 2
Je. V. Kurbatova
Russian Federation
Department of Stomatology № 2
References
1. Назарян Д.Н., Караян А.С., Захаров Г.К., Сенюк А.Н., Алиев С.Э. Использование костных блоков при синус-лифтинге. // Стоматологи. -2014.-N 3.-С.57-63.
2. Зерницкий А.Ю., Кузьмина И.В. Факторы, влияющие на благоприятный исход операции синус-лифтинг. // Институт стоматологии. -2012. -№3. –С.56-57.
3. Anavi Y. Complications of maxillary sinus augmentations in a selective series of patients. // Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. Endod. - 2008. -Vol. 106, №1. - P. 34-38.
4. Даминов Р.О.Воспаление верхнечелюстной пазухи после операции дентальной имплантации и синуслифтинга. // Стоматология. -2010.-N 5.-С.59-62.
5. Вишняков В.В., Харламов А.А., Панин А.М. Роль патологии нутриносовых структур в развитии осложнений операции синуслифтинг.// Российская ринология. - 2010.-N 4.-С.25-28.
6. Barone A. A clinical study of the outcomes and complications associated with maxillary sinus augmentation. // Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants. -2006. - Vol. 21, №1. - P. 81-85.
7. Качалова A.B. Эндоскопический контроль верхнечелюстной пазухи в имплантологии. // Российская оториноларингология. -2007. -№ 1. -С. 98-103.
8. Кулаков А.А., Шелудченко Т.П.Буцан С.Б., Даминов Р.О., Сухарский И.И. Одномоментная эндоназальная санация верхнечелюстной пазухи и эндоскопическиассистированный синус-лифтинг у пациентов перед дентальной имплантацией. // Институтстоматологии. -2010.-N 4.-С.52-53.
9. Lund V.J., Kennedy D.W. Quantification for staging sinusitis. International conference on sinus disease: terminology, staging, therapy // Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar-yngol. - 1995. - Vol.-104, Suppl. - P.17-21.
10. Иванов С.Ю., Мураев А.А., Ямуркова Н.Ф., Мигура С.А.Устранение дефектов мембраны Шнейдера, возникающих во время операции синус-лифтинга. // Стоматология. - 2010. -№2. –С.48-51.
Review
For citations:
Maksjukov S.J., Shhepljakov D.S., Borzilov A.V., Kozhemjakina E.S., Kurbatova J.V. PREVENTION OF MUCOSAL PERFORATION OF THE BOTTOM OF THE MAXILLARY SINUS WITH AN OPEN SINUS LIFTING DUE TO THE SIMULTANEOUS CONDUCTION OF ENDONASAL INTERVENTIONS ON THE MAXILLARY SINUS. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2015;(3):82-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2015-3-82-85