Scroll to:
Adjuvant activity of glucosaminylmuramyldipeptide and prospects of its use for the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2024-15-4-72-78
Abstract
The purpose of the review was to analyze the literature data on the effect of glucosominylmuramyldipeptide on factors of innate and adaptive immunity in the treatment and prevention of various infectious diseases. The purpose of the review was to examine studies conducted over the past 20 years concerning the use of GMDP for the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases of various etiologies. The literature was searched using databases such as RSCI, eLibrary, MedLine. The following search words were used: muramyldipeptide, muramyldipeptide mechanism of action, glucosominylmuramyldipeptide for the treatment of infectious diseases, glucosominylmuramyldipeptide for the prevention of infectious diseases, glucosominylmuramyldipeptide as an adjuvant. GMDP is an activator of innate and acquired immunity, strengthens the body's protection against viral, bacterial and fungal infections, and also has an adjuvant effect in the development of a post-vaccination immune response, which determines the prospects for its further use to improve treatment regimens and specific prevention of various infectious diseases.
Keywords
For citations:
Filippenko A.V., Ivanova I.A., Omelchenko N.D., Trufanova A.A. Adjuvant activity of glucosaminylmuramyldipeptide and prospects of its use for the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2024;15(4):72-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2024-15-4-72-78
Introduction
To date, a fairly large number of immunomodulatory drugs are used in clinical practice for the treatment and prevention of many infectious and non-infectious diseases. The most promising are adjuvants, which, when co-administered with attenuated or killed antigens, can increase the immune response of the macroorganism, but at the same time be weakly reactogenic [1]. In the course of numerous studies, it was found that substances of natural origin obtained using chemical synthesis methods were the most effective and safe immunomodulators and adjuvants. A promising class of synthetic immunomodulators is muramyldipeptide (MDP) and its derivatives, including glucosominylmuramyldipeptide (GMDP). The advantage of these drugs is a sufficiently well-studied chemical composition and structure of the molecule of substance, an easily reproducible structure, and the absence of harmful and undesirable impurities [2].
Approximately 100 literature sources related to the use of muramyl dipeptides from the RSCI, eLibrary, and MedLine databases over the past 20 years were analyzed for this review. The review cites 52 of the most significant papers covering the study of the use of GMDP mainly for prophylactic purposes in infectious diseases, as well as the adjuvant effect of the drug. The review did not include work on the use of GMDP in other various fields of medicine, as well as the use of foreign analogs of GMDP as an adjuvant, such as murabutide, romurtide, and 6-O- (tetradecylhexadecanoyl) -N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine.
Discovery history of the drug
MDP was isolated from Mycobacterium tuberculosis by French scientists in 1974. This compound, consisting of one sugar molecule and two amino acids, is a component of peptidoglycan of the bacterial cell wall and has immunogenic and adjuvant activity [3].
At the same time, MDP was obtained from the Lactobacillus bulgaricus bacterium under the guidance of Professor V.T. Ivanova and Dr. T.M. Andronova, and contained the second sugar molecule N-acetylglucosamine, unlike a foreign substance. This compound, called GMDP, demonstrated not only higher adjuvant activity but also the ability to stimulate non-specific resistance to bacterial and viral infections, while being a non-toxic and slightly pyrogenic substance. Soviet scientists developed a chemical method for producing highly purified GMDP with standard characteristics on an industrial scale and, most importantly, with predictable bioactivity. Subsequently, this drug successfully passed clinical trials in leading medical institutions in Russia, Australia, and the UK and received state registration [4].
Employees of the Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of RAS and the Institute of Immunology of the FMBA of Russia in 1996 were awarded the State Prize in the field of science and technology for the development and creation of a biotechnological production of a new immunocorrective drug. Currently, GMDP is widely used in Russia, in the republics of Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan, as well as in Mongolia [3]. Extensive experience in the use of this drug has been accumulated; its effectiveness and safety for the treatment and prevention of various infectious, autoimmune, allergic, and oncological diseases, as well as secondary immunodeficiencies have been proven [4].
GMDP is recommended for the prevention of acute respiratory viral infections and other infectious diseases, increasing the effectiveness of antibacterial and antiviral drugs, the body's general resistance to pathogens, reducing the manifestation of chronic diseases during their exacerbation, as well as an adjuvant in licensed and new experimental vaccine preparations. At the same time, GMDP is a highly purified, non-toxic, non-carcinogenic [5], and non-mutagenic drug and has a simple and convenient dosage form, which allows it to be used in all age groups, including children from birth [6][7].
Since the discovery of this drug, rare cases of side effects such as fever (to subfebrile values) and diarrhea have been recorded; in isolated cases, myalgia and arthralgia have been recorded. It should be noted that all observed adverse reactions were indicated in the instructions for GMDP use [8].
Mechanism of muramyldipeptide action
GMDP is a synthetic analog of MDP, which is the minimal component of peptidoglycan of cell walls of both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, and is capable of causing an immune response in animals. MDP has all the necessary properties of pathogen-associated molecular structures, which is expressed in the stimulation of innate immunity factors and the ability to form protection against various foreign agents [7][9]. Normal intestinal microflora serves as a constant source of MDP, thus contributing to the maintenance of the immune system in an active state and constant readiness to protect against foreign influences. Peptidoglycan fragments are released from the cell wall of bacteria, absorbed in the small intestine, and affect the immune and inflammatory response in the gastrointestinal tract, as well as in other organs. As a result of the interaction of MDP with resident antigen-presenting cells, activated antigen-presenting cells are formed which have a homeostatic effect and promote the proliferation of regulatory CD4 lymphocytes that do not cause inflammation. Thus, normally in the human body, there is a constant stimulation of the immune system by MDP from the intestine [10].
The biological activity of MDP is carried out due to a specific interaction with the intracellular receptor protein NOD2, which is expressed in the cytoplasm of phagocytes-monocytes, neutrophils, dendritic and epithelial cells [3][11–12]. However, in addition to NOD2, other cytosolic receptors of innate immunity were identified: YB1 [13], Pept2 and Pht1 [14], the binding of MDP to which led to cell proliferation and differentiation, their response to stress exposures.
The NOD2 receptor is a member of the family of cytosolic proteins (NLR), components of the innate immune system belonging to the so-called image-recognizing receptors. The NOD2 consists of three domains: the C-terminal region is responsible for ligand recognition (MDP), and the central domain is responsible for nucleotide-binding oligomerization and the N-terminal domain (activation and recruitment of caspase) transmits information to signaling molecules and transcription factors in the nucleus [15][16]. It has been proven that activation of the NOD2 receptor is a key moment for triggering adaptive immunity to bacterial, viral, and parasitic infections, and contributes to the formation of an adequate and prolonged immune response [17]. Bacteria are absorbed by phagocytic cells, the bacterial wall is split under the influence of enzymes, and MDP is released into the cell. It binds to the ligand-binding domain of the NOD2 protein, transmits a signal from the effector domain, and triggers a cascade of reactions. The activated NOD2 receptor oligomerizes, forms an inflammasome, and interacts with protein 2 kinase, then through phosphorylation and ubiquitination reactions the signal goes to the nuclear transcription factor NF-kB (nuclear factor κB), which induces the expression of a large number of genes, in particular pro-inflammatory cytokine genes, adhesion molecules, acute-phase proteins, inflammation enzymes (NO synthase and cyclooxygenase), major histocompatibility complex molecules, etc. All these events lead to the synthesis of a wide range of cytokines IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, TNF-α, INF-γ, and colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) by the cell. The end result of activation is an inflammatory reaction of the body mediated by the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines by cells of the innate immunity system. The synthesis of IL-1 and TNF-α under the influence of MDP enhances the antimicrobial function of neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages, increases the cytotoxic activity of phagocytes, NK cells, and killer T cells, and induction of CSF synthesis activates leukopoiesis [7][18–21].
MDP is characterized by running at once two activation paths of NF-κB (classical and alternative), which contributes to the initiation of both innate and adaptive immunity [22]. The ability of MDP to interact with NOD2 receptors of epithelial cells, inducing the synthesis of IL-6, chemokine CXCL-8, and antimicrobial peptide β-defensin, as well as increasing the production of reactive oxygen species in epithelial cells, thereby contributing to the protection of mucous membranes from pathogenic microorganisms, is equally important [23]. It should be noted that MDP activates not only the NF-κB signaling pathway, but also the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) and interferon (IFN) pathways, which leads to an increase in the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines, induction, proliferation, and differentiation of immunocompetent cells [7][23].
Effect of the drug on the factors of innate and adaptive immunity in various infectious diseases
It has been shown that GMDP, being a synthetic analog of MDP, in the peripheral blood of the examined patients causes an increase in the total number of dendritic cells (DCs) and a statistically significant increase in the expression of the chemokine CCR7 responsible for DC migration to secondary lymphoid organs [24]. GMDP increases the expression of HLA-DR antigens, thereby improving the recognition of pathogen antigens, as well as the production of pro-inflammatory mediators, cytokines, and their soluble and membrane-associated receptors [25]. GMDP acts on monocytic-macrophage cells, stimulating the activity of lysosomal enzymes and the formation of reactive oxygen species, and acts on the absorption and cytotoxic properties of virally infected and tumor cells [7][25–31]. The use of GMDP leads to an increase in the level of intracellular defensins in the neutrophils of peripheral blood [32], an increase in their phagocytic activity, as well as bactericidal and metabolic activity [33–34].
The drug not only stimulates the bactericidal and cytotoxic activities of neutrophils and macrophages but also enhances the functional activity of effectors of the adaptive immune response in patients infected with pathogens of various etiologies.
In patients whose treatment regimen includes GMDP, recovered parameters of immune status are observed [28]: an increase in the number of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD16+ lymphocytes [26][27][31][33][35][36-38], as well as CD19+ lymphocytes [29][39]. During treatment, under the influence of GMDP, the concentration of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1 β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF- α, as well as the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-4, increases [29].
In addition to stimulating cellular immunity in patients with viral and bacterial infections, an increase in the production of serum IgG [26], as well as secretory IgA, in the oral cavity was found [27][40].
Thus, GMDP triggers the mechanisms of the innate immune response, cellular and humoral immunity, effectively activating antibacterial and antiviral defense [25], which makes it possible to use this drug widely in the treatment and prevention of various infectious diseases. Despite the data obtained during clinical trials on the ineffectiveness of the use of GMDP in the prevention of influenza in the elderly [41], the presence of immunostimulatory and antiviral activity of this drug against influenza [35] and other viral infections in children and adults has now been proven [24][26–28][38–39][42][43]. The feasibility of the inclusion of an immunomodulatory GMDP drug in the treatment of patients with bacterial infections [29–33][36][40][44], including tuberculosis in adults and children [37], as well as in the complex therapy of pneumonia and urinary system infections in newborns and premature children, has been shown [7].
Positive results were obtained during experiments to study the possibility of using this immunomodulator in treatment regimens for intestinal [34] and especially dangerous infections [45].
Prospects for using GMDP as an adjuvant
In addition to using GMDP for the treatment of various diseases, the high adjuvant activity of this drug was also noted. The adjuvant effect of GMDP is due to its ability to increase the activity of neutrophils, DCs, and macrophages, increase the expression of receptors on the surface of these cells for chemotaxis, adhesion, and absorption of antigens, stimulate the processing and presentation of antigens included in the vaccine preparation, thus enhancing antibody production, antibody-mediated cytotoxicity, and other cellular immunity reactions [6]. The efficacy of the combined effect of GMDP, a number of other immunomodulators, and specific vaccines against arbovirus infections has been proven [46-47]. The ability of GMDP to enhance humoral and cellular immune response to corpuscular and soluble antigens was revealed. The presence of a pronounced stimulating effect was shown in preclinical studies of an experimental HIV vaccine containing recombinant gp120 antigen when using GMDP as an adjuvant [6].
The feasibility of introducing GMDP into the scheme of emergency and specific prevention of especially dangerous infections is evidenced by the positive results obtained by domestic scientists in improving vaccines against anthrax infection [45], brucellosis [48], as well as cholera [49–50]. The use of GMDP as an adjuvant indicates the promise of its use to increase the effectiveness of specific prevention of these infections.
Conclusion
Thus, all of the mentioned above proves the efficacy of using GMDP in the treatment and prevention of various infectious diseases, including especially dangerous ones. The ability of GMDP to activate the mechanisms of innate and acquired cellular and humoral immunities and to stimulate both antibacterial and antiviral protection opens up new prospects for its use to improve the treatment and prevention of various diseases, as well as the use of this drug as an adjuvant with licensed and experimental vaccines.
References
1. Kitaura H, Ishida M, Kimura K, Sugisawa H, Kishikawa A, et al. Role of Muramyl Dipeptide in Lipopolysaccharide-Mediated Biological Activity and Osteoclast Activity. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2018;2018:8047610. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8047610
2. Kozlov I.G., Timakov M.A. Immunotherapy: yesterday, today, tomorrow. Pediatriya. Zhurnal im G.N. Speranskogo. 2009;87(4):140-149. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 12858377 EDN: KVjwRP
3. Khaitov R.M. Immunomodulators: myths and reality. Immunologiya. 2020;41(2):101-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33029/0206-4952-2020-41-2-101-106
4. Guryanova SV, Khaitov RM. Strategies for Using Muramyl Peptides - Modulators of Innate Immunity of Bacterial Origin - in Medicine. Front Immunol. 2021;12:607178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.607178
5. Gudyrev OS, Andronova TM, Nesterova EI. The results of the study of the carcinogenic properties of glucosaminylmuramyldipeptide GMDP in chronic experiments in mice and rats. Research Results in Pharmacology. 2018;4(4):97–106. https://doi.org/10.3897/rrpharmacology.4.32191
6. Polovinkina V.S., Markov E.Y. Structure and adjuvanticity immune properties of muramyldipeptide. BULLETIN OF THE All-Russian Scientific Research CENTER OF THE Russian Academy OF Sciences. 2012;83(1):149-153. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 17902836 EDN: PBTYwD
7. Ushkalova E.A., Zyryanov S.K., Zatolochina K.E. Muramyldipeptide – based compounds in current medicine: focus on glucosaminylmuramyl dipeptide. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2019;91(12):122-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26442/00403660.2019.12.000471
8. Krasheninnikov A.E., Matveev A.V., Andronova T.M., Guryanova S.V., Shilova N.V., Kozlov I.G. Safety of using the preparation “Licopid®” in opinion of experts in various specialities. Perm Medical Journal. 2019;36(2):81-92. https://doi.org/10.17816/pmj36281-92
9. Abdulguseynova K.A., Alieva M.U., Vrubel M.E., Huseynov A.K., Strugovschik Y.S. Clinical pharmacology of lycopene. The successes of modern natural science. 2014;11-3:126-127. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 22373762 EDN: SVPSVB
10. Kanner E.V., Gorelov A.V., Pechkurov D.V., Gorelova E.A., Maksimov M.L., Ermolaeva A.S. Mucosal immune system of digestive and respiratory tracts: possibilities of prevention and treatment of infectious diseases. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2019;(11):100-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701x-2019-11-100-107
11. Mukherjee T, Hovingh ES, Foerster EG, Abdel-Nour M, Philpott Dj, Girardin SE. NOD1 and NOD2 in inflammation, immunity and disease. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2019;670:69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2018.12.022
12. Tsukidate T, Hespen Cw, Hang HC. Small molecule modulators of immune pattern recognition receptors. RSC Chem Biol. 2023;4(12):1014-1036. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cb00096f
13. Laman AG, Lathe R, Shepelyakovskaya AO, Gartseva A, Brovko FA, et al. Muramyl peptides activate innate immunity conjointly via YB1 and NOD2. Innate Immun. 2016;22(8):666-673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753425916668982
14. Hu Y, Song F, jiang H, Nuñez G, Smith DE. SLC15A2 and SLC15A4 Mediate the Transport of Bacterially Derived Di/ Tripeptides To Enhance the Nucleotide-Binding Oligomerization Domain-Dependent Immune Response in Mouse Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages. J Immunol. 2018;201(2):652-662. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800210
15. Girardin SE, Boneca IG, Carneiro LA, Antignac A, jéhanno M, et al. Nod1 detects a unique muropeptide from gram-negative bacterial peptidoglycan. Science. 2003;300(5625):1584-1587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084677
16. Viala ja, Sansonetti P, Philpott Dj. Nods and 'intracellular' innate immunity. C R Biol. 2004;327(6):551-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2004.02.010
17. Mulder wjM, Ochando j, joosten LAB, Fayad ZA, Netea MG. Therapeutic targeting of trained immunity. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(7):553-566. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0025-4
18. Petnicki-Ocwieja T, Hrncir T, Liu Yj, Biswas A, Hudcovic T, et al. Nod2 is required for the regulation of commensal microbiota in the intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(37):15813-15818. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907722106
19. Geddes K, Magalhães jG, Girardin SE. Unleashing the therapeutic potential of NOD-like receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8(6):465-479. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2783
20. Sirard jC, Vignal C, Dessein R, Chamaillard M. Nod-like receptors: cytosolic watchdogs for immunity against pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3(12):e152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0030152
21. Irazoki O, Hernandez SB, Cava F. Peptidoglycan Muropeptides: Release, Perception, and Functions as Signaling Molecules. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00500
22. Meshcheryakova E.A., Andronova T.M., Ivanov V.T. Protein interaction network and signaling pathways activated by muramyl peptides. Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry. 2010;36(5);535-549. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162010050018
23. Karaulov A.V., Kalyuzhin O.V. Immunotherapy for infectious diseases: challenges and prospects. Therapeutic Archive. 2013;11:100-108. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 21085880 EDN: RTKZHV
24. Guryanova S.V., Kudryashova N.A., Kataeva A.A., Orozbekova B.T., Kolesnikova N.V., Chuchalin A.G. Novel approaches to increase resistance to acute respiratory infections. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2021;25(3):181-195. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0245-2021-25-3-181-195
25. Kabdenova A.T., Satybaldieva j.A. quantum chemical analysis of the structure of Lycopene and the expression level of CD markers. Almanac of modern science and Education. 2010;(9):67-70. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 17342393 EDN: OPNCHD
26. Guryanova S.V., Khaitov R.M. Glucosaminylmuramyldipeptide in the therapy and prevention of infectious diseases. Infectious diseases: news, opinions, training. 2020; 9(3):79-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33029/2305-3496-2020-9-3-79-86.
27. Voronina E.V. GMDP (Liсopid) in reducing the seasonal morbidity in adults (data of blind, placebocontrolled study). Practical medicine. Otorhinolaryngology. Allergology. Pulmonology. 2011;48(1):2-4. (In Russ.)
28. Zurochka V.A., Zabkov O.I., Dobrynina M.A., Gritsenko V.F., Davydova E.V., et al. Clinical diagnostic criteria of efficiency for combined etiopathogenetic therapy in patients with chronic Epstein–Barr virus infection. Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity. 2020;10(2):338-346. https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-CDC-1141
29. Stagnieva I.V., Simbirtsev A.S. Immunotherapy efficiency in rhinosinusitis patients. Medical Immunology (Russia). 2015;17(5):423-430. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-2015-5-423-430
30. Zemskova V.A., Zemskov A.M., Zemskov V.M., Zoloedov V.I. The actual problems of immune therapy of pyo-inflammatory diseases. Russian Medicine. 2016;22(2):70-74. https://doi.org/10.18821/0869-2106-2016-22-2-70-74
31. Perova M.V., Kuznetsova R.N., Batsunov O.K., Totolyan A.A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of lycopide in the analysis of indicators of the immune status of patients with chronic recurrent furunculosis. Immunological problems in surgery. 2017;19:232-233. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 29758368 EDN: ZBFGOD
32. Tsyvkina E.A., Fedenko E.S., Budikhina A.S., Pinegin B.V. Immune therapy influence on a-defensin level in peripheral blood neutrophiles in pyodermia patients. Russian Journal of Allergy. 2010;7(6):25-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36691/RjA881
33. Peschany V.G. The role of immunomodulators in the conservative treatment of children with chronic tonsillitis. National health. 2020;2:35-38. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 43142238 EDN: EHOxNE
34. Milutina L.N., Golubev A.O. The experience of using Lycopene for the rehabilitation of post-infectious salmonella bacteriocarriage in children. Russian Bulletin of Perinatology of Pediatrics. 2015;4:100–108. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 24336899 EDN: UMORHT
35. Guryanova S.V, Khaitov R.M. Glucosaminylmuramyldipeptide - GMDP: effect on mucosal immunity (on the issue of immunotherapy and immunoprophylaxis). Immunologiya. 2020;41(2):174-183. (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33029/0206-4952-2020-41-2-174-183
36. Zharkova O.A. The effectiveness of immunocorrective therapy in chronic periodontitis. Dentist. Minsk. 2020;3(38):60-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32993/dentist.20.3(38).3
37. Malyavin. A.G. Review of the possibilities of using the drug Lycopid in pulmonological and phthisiological practice. Therapy. 2020;5:174-186. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2020.5.174-186
38. Skiba T.A. The effectiveness of GMDP in immunorehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease associated with osteoarthritis. Postgraduate doctor. 2017;3 (82):46-51. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 29060817 EDN: YLYjTH
39. Makatsariya A.D., Bitsadze V.O., Khizroeva j.Kh., Vikulov G. Kh., Gomberg M.A., Khryanin A.A. Efficacy and safety of glucosaminylmuramyl dipeptide in treatment of human papillomavirus-associated diseases: a systematic review. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2019;13(2):132-154. https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347.2019.13.2.132-154
40. Guryanova S.V., Kolesnikova N.V., Gudima G.O., Lezhava N.L., Karaulov A.V. Dynamics of immunological and microbiological indicators of oral fluid in caries therapy. Immunologiya. 2021;42(4):386-394. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33029/0206-4952-2021-42-4-386-394
41. Palache AM, Beyer wE, Hendriksen E, Gerez L, Aston R, et al. Adjuvancy and reactogenicity of N-acetylglucosaminyl-N-acetylmuramyl-dipeptide (GMDP) orally administered just prior to trivalent influenza subunit vaccine. A double-blind placebo-controlled study in nursing home residents. Vaccine. 1996;14(14):1327-1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-410x(96)00075-8
42. Soboleva NG, Shapovalova TI, Osipova IG. Results of double-blind randomized study of clinical efficacy of Licopid in complex treatment of cytomegalovirus hepatitis in children. Pediatriya: nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal. 2009;87(2):100-103 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 12859999 EDN: KVKURL
43. Konorev M.R. The use of the immunomodulator lycopide during the first-choice antichelicobacter therapy. Immunopathology, allergology, and infectology. 2012;1:45–50. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 21165788 EDN: RVELjR
44. Grudyanov AI, Fomenko EV, Kalyuzhin OV. Antibacterial effect of a non-specific immunomodulator based on muramilpeptides in chronic periodontitis. Stomatology. 2021;100(4):16-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202110004116
45. Zhukova S.I., Khabarova I.A., Toporkov A.V., Victorov D.V., Ageeva N.P., Senina T.V. Improving emergency prevention and treatment of dangerous infections using immunomodulators. Astrakhan medical journal. 2019;14(3):20-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17021/2019.14.3.20.36
46. Barinsky I.F., Lazarenko A.A., Alimbarova L.M. The study of the effectiveness of the use of domestic immunomodulators, as well as their combined action with specific vaccines in experimental arbovirus infections. Immunology. 2012;4:181-183. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 18756125 EDN: PULLMF
47. Barinsky I.F., Alimbarova L.M., Lazarenko A.A., Davydova A.A. Immunomodulators and specific inactivated vaccines in the emergency prevention of experimental arbovirus infections. Questions of virology. 2013;58(4):35. (In Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 20502316 EDN: RGqYSD
48. Bogacheva N.V., Okhapkina V.Y., Pyatkova N.V., Fedotov A.K., Kucherenko A.S. Experimental Research of the Influence of Immunomodulators on Efficiency Using of Brucellosis Living Dry Vaccine. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2016;15(2):84-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2016-15-2-84-92
49. Filippenko A.V., Ivanova I.A., Omelchenko N.D., Trufanova A.A. The influence of immunomodulators on the formation of vaccine-induced cholera immunity. Journal of microbiology, epidemiology and immunobiology. 2022;99(1):81-92. https://doi.org/10.36233/0372-9311-188
50. Filippenko A.V., Omelchenko N.D., Pasyukova N.I., Trufanova A.A., Ivanova I.A. Improvement of specific cholera prevention using immunomodulators. Medical Immunology (Russia). 2021;23(4):915-920. https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-IOS-2248
About the Authors
A. V. FilippenkoRussian Federation
Anna V. Filippenko, junior Researcher, Laboratory of Immunology
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest.
I. A. Ivanova
Russian Federation
Inna A. Ivanova, Cand. Sci. (Bio), Leading Researcher Acting Head of the Laboratory Immunology
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest.
N. D. Omelchenko
Russian Federation
Natalia D. Omelchenko, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher Laboratory of Immunology
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest.
A. A. Trufanova
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Trufanova, junior Researcher, Laboratory of Immunology
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest.
Review
For citations:
Filippenko A.V., Ivanova I.A., Omelchenko N.D., Trufanova A.A. Adjuvant activity of glucosaminylmuramyldipeptide and prospects of its use for the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2024;15(4):72-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2024-15-4-72-78