Scroll to:
Working condition and health status of employees of the aviation enterprise
https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2024-15-2-155-160
Abstract
Objective: a hygienic assessment of working conditions and an analysis of the morbidity of aircraft workers.
Materials and methods: the study was carried out on the basis of data from the Office of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being in the Republic of Tatarstan (Tatarstan) and the Center for Occupational Pathology Scientific and Clinical Center for Preventive Medicine of the Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology of the Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University.
Results: hygienic monitoring of the working conditions of employees of the aviation plant showed a combined effect of harmful factors of the production environment and the labor process, corresponding to classes 3.1–3.2 in a number of professions. Among the diseases identified in employees of the enterprise, diseases of the eye and its accessory apparatus, circulatory organs and hearing predominate. According to the results of the medical examination, 6.4% of the subjects were found to have a suspicion of occupational chronic bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
Conclusions: research results indicate that there is a risk of developing occupational pathology as a result of exposure to physical factors. The employer was given recommendations to improve working conditions and preserve the health of workers.
For citations:
Sabitova M.M., Shulaev A.V., Berkheeva Z.M., Garipova R.V., Sabitov A.Z. Working condition and health status of employees of the aviation enterprise. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2024;15(2):155-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2024-15-2-155-160
Introduction
Maintaining and strengthening the health of the working population are priority tasks of healthcare in the Russian Federation. Working conditions at numerous aircraft manufacturing enterprises do not meet sanitary standards, causing the development of professional and work-related pathologies [1-6]. Currently, the problems of their prevention and reduction remain relevant in occupational medicine [7]. The aviation industry of the Republic of Tatarstan includes enterprises producing aircraft engines, airplanes, and helicopters. Every year, high rates of occupational diseases are registered at PJSC Kazan Helicopter Plant, S.P. Gorbunov Kazan Aviation Plant – a branch of PJSC Tupolev1.
The study aims to make a hygienic assessment of working conditions and to study the incidence of workers in the aircraft industry based on the results of mandatory periodic medical examinations.
Materials and Methods
A comprehensive hygienic assessment of the production environment and work process factors was based on the results of a special assessment of working conditions and production control data in the tool manufacturing shop and in the product repair and modernization shop, which included an assessment of chemical factors, noise, vibration, and the severity of the work process.
The data analysis of air pollution in the working area was based on the current regulatory and methodological framework: GOST 12.1.005-882 and SanPiN 1.2.3685-213. Vibroacoustic factors were analyzed in accordance with GOST 12.1.003-834, GOST ISO 9612-20165, GOST 12.1.012-20046, GOST 31319-20067, and SanPiN 1.2.3685-213. The severity of the work process, as well as a comprehensive assessment of working conditions, is given in accordance with R 2.2.2006-058. Industrial control was carried out in accordance with the Sanitary Rules SR 1.1.1058-019.
The working conditions of the following main professions were assessed: fitters and assemblers of electrical equipment in the repair shop, product modernization, as well as toolmakers, fitters of mechanical assembly works (MAW), and milling machine operators in the tool manufacturing shop.
The assessed health status of workers was based on the results of mandatory periodic medical examination of 187 workers with a questionnaire survey to collect anamnesis, identify aggravated heredity, complaints and symptoms, risk factors for the development of non-communicable diseases, nutritional status, and physical activity. The primary medical examination of workers included that by a physician, neurologist, ophthalmologist, dermatovenereologist, otolaryngologist, surgeon, psychiatrist and psychiatrist-narcologist, obstetrician-gynecologist, and laboratory and functional studies: calculation of body mass index, complete blood count, clinical urine analysis, determination of total cholesterol and the blood glucose level, electrocardiography, fluorography, measurement of blood pressure, intraocular pressure in individuals aged 40 years and older, mammography of both mammary glands in two projections, ultrasound examination of the pelvic organs, and bacteriological (for flora) and cytological (for atypical cells) examination.
A total of 138 men and 49 women underwent the primary medical examination: 42 people (22.5%) aged 20–29, 29 people (15.5%) aged 30–39, 43 people (23%) aged 40–49, 30 people (16%) aged 50–59, 38 people (20.3%) aged 60–69, 5 people (2.7%) over 70; 69 people (36.9%) had work experience of up to 10 years, 47 people (25.1%) 11–20, 40 people (21.4%) 21–30, and 31 people (16.6%) over 30. The ranking by profession was as follows: fitters (74) – 39.6%, electrical equipment fitters (61) – 32.6%, toolmakers (28) – 15.0%, milling machine operators (13) – 7.0%, MAW fitters (11) – 5.9%.
The information obtained was summarized, systematized, and analyzed using descriptive statistics methods with the determination of shares in percentages.
Results
During their work, workers in repair shops, in product modernization, and manufacturing of technological equipment are exposed to the combined effects of harmful production factors. At a significant number of workplaces during the work shift, noise is observed, the sources of which are technological equipment, pneumatic tools, and a stand for processing hydraulic systems. By origin, the noise is predominantly mechanical, by spectral composition broadband, and by exposure time inconsistent.
Analysis of the results of noise level measurement protocols in the repair and product modernization shop showed that the noise level of fitters was 83.7 dBA, while for working with pneumatic tools it was 86.5 dBA, at the workplace of electrical equipment fitters – 83.8 dBA, and for soldering work – 84.1 dBA. In the toolmaking shop at the production site, the equivalent sound level of 76.3 dBA was established for toolmakers, while for a pneumatic grinding machine it was 97.2 dBA, for milling machine operators – 81 dBA, while working on a console-milling machine – 83.4 dBA. At the workplaces of MAW fitters, for a radial drilling machine, the noise level was 81 dBA (84.4 dBA in the work area), and for pneumatic tools it was 87.5 dBA.
Thus, all the studied professional groups are exposed to adverse noise effects, the equivalent levels of which exceed the maximum permissible level. Moreover, for MAW fitters and toolmakers, the working conditions in terms of noise are second-degree harm, and for other professional groups – first-degree harm.
Contact with local vibration is found among fitters-assemblers, MAW fitters, and toolmakers. The sources of local vibration for MAW fitters and toolmakers are grinding machines, and for fitters-assemblers – pneumatic tools. In these professions, vibration was inconsistent. The analysis of local vibration parameters by vibration velocity for a pneumatic grinding machine in the production area of the toolmaking shop showed that the maximum permissible level was exceeded by 1 dB. The equivalent corrected vibration acceleration value for an 8-hour working day was 116.1–127 dB with a maximum permissible level of 126 dB, which corresponds to harmful working conditions of the first degree. Measurements of local vibration levels at the workplaces of assemblers and MAW fitters did not reveal any deviations from the standard values.
An unfavorable production factor is chemical air pollution in the working area [3]. Chemical compounds were identified in the product repair and modernization shop. In the air of the working area of the fitter-assembler during metal degreasing, the average shift values of kerosene concentration at 100% of the exposure time were 163.5 mg/m³, which did not exceed the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) (300 mg/m³). In the air of the working area of the electrical equipment installer during soldering, the content of lead and its inorganic compounds, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide at 35% of the exposure time did not exceed the MPC.
In the product repair and modernization shop, in the air of the working area of the MAW fitters when working on a sharpening and grinding machine, the maximum one-time and average shift values of silicon dioxide concentration did not exceed the MPC.
The predominant indicator of the severity of the work among those surveyed is the posture (uncomfortable, forced, or standing), the class of working conditions is 3.1-3.2.
Assessment of working conditions by the degree of harmfulness and danger of production environment factors, the severity and intensity of the work process [8] allowed classifying working conditions in a number of professions as first- and second-degree harm10 (Table 1).
Among the most common diseases identified in the periodic medical examination were diseases of the eye and ocular adnexa 23% (43 people) – refractive and accommodation disorders (myopia and hyperopia) and early senile cataract, as well as arterial hypertension 17% (32 people) and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SHL) 12.8% (24 people). Obesity and hypercholesterolemia were detected in 12.3% (23 people), and diabetes mellitus in 2.7% (5 people). Anemia was observed in 3.7% (7 people). Pathology of the genitourinary system and musculoskeletal system was 2.7% (5 people) and 9.1% (17 people), respectively. A study of fasting blood glucose levels revealed unspecified hyperglycemia in 3.7% (7 people) of those examined.
In 12 people, occupational SHL was suspected, which amounted to 6.4% of the number of workers examined. In 41.7% of cases, SHL was observed in toolmakers (5 people) aged 57–65, with 16–36 years of work experience in contact with noise, in 33.3% in assemblers (4 people) aged 58–74 with 10–21 years of work experience, in 8.3% among MAW fitters, electrical equipment assemblers and milling machine operators.
Ranking of workers by health groups showed that 55.8% (70 people) had Groups IIIa and IIIb, 28.3% (53 people) and 34.2% (64 people) had Groups I and II, respectively.
An analysis of the prevalence of chronic diseases (depending on the profession) in the workshops for technological equipment production, repair and products modernization showed their higher proportion among fitters-assemblers, fitters-toolmakers, and milling machine operators (Table 2).
Discussion
The research showed that the working conditions in the aviation industry were characterized by the impact of a complex of unfavorable production factors, the main being noise and local vibration. Local vibration levels exceeded the standard values at the workplace of a toolmaker (class of working conditions – 3.1). The greatest excess of permissible noise parameters was noted among toolmakers and MAW fitters (class of working conditions – 3.2). The predominant indicator of the severity of the work process among assemblers, toolmakers, mechanical assembly fitters, aircraft electrical equipment fitters, and milling machine operators was the working posture (uncomfortable, forced, or standing).
The “leaders” in the identified structure are diseases of the eye and ocular adnexa, of circulatory and hearing organs. In 5 professional categories of workers, occupational SHL was suspected. Ranking by profession and age showed SHL prevalence among toolmakers and assemblers over 60 years of age. The dependence of occupational and general somatic morbidity on the working conditions of employees of the aviation enterprise was established.
Conclusion
The study indicates a risk of developing occupational pathology as a result of exposure to physical factors, mainly bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The materials of the study allow giving recommendations to the employer on ensuring industrial control over factors of the working environment in accordance with the requirements of Paragraphs 1.5 and 2.5 of the sanitary rules “Organization and implementation of industrial control over compliance with sanitary rules and the implementation of sanitary and anti-epidemic (preventive) measures – SR 1.1.1058-01”, preventing employees from performing their work duties without undergoing mandatory medical examinations, as well as in case of detecting medical contraindications11.
1. On the state of sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population in the Republic of Tatarstan in 2021: State report. 338 p.
2. GOST 12.1.005-88 “Occupational safety standards system. General sanitary and hygienic requirements for the air of the working area”.
3. SanPiN 1.2.3685-21 “Hygienic standards and requirements for ensuring the safety and (or) harmlessness of environmental factors for humans”.
4. GOST 12.1.003-83 “Occupational safety standards system. Noise. General safety requirements”.
5. GOST ISO 9612-2016 “Acoustics. Noise measurements to assess its impact on humans. Method of measurements at workplaces”.
6. GOST 12.1.012-2004 “Occupational safety standards system. Vibration safety. General requirements”.
7. GOST 31319-2006 “Vibration. Measurement of general vibration and assessment of its impact on humans. Requirements for measurements at workplaces”.
8. R 2.2.2006-05 “Guidelines for hygienic assessment of factors of the working environment and labor. Criteria and classification of working conditions”.
9. SR 1.1.1058-01 “Organization and implementation of industrial control over compliance with sanitary rules and implementation of sanitary and anti-epidemic (preventive) measures”.
10. Order of the Ministry of Labor of Russia dated January 24, 2014 No. 33n “On approval of the Methodology for conducting a special assessment of working conditions, the Classifier of harmful and (or) hazardous production factors, the form of the report on the special assessment of working conditions and instructions for filling it out”.
11. Labor Code of the Russian Federation of December 30, 2001 No. 197-FL. Part III. Section X. Chapter 35. Article 214. “Employer's Responsibilities in the Field of Labor Protection”.
References
1. Demchenko V.G., Usatov A.N, Buryan Yu.A. Labor conditions and preventive measures for health of workers at enterprises of aircraft manufacturing. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2008;(2):29-32 (in Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 15320007 EDN: MXGLIJ
2. Kriga A.S. Usatov A.N. Working conditions and health status of the employees of the enterprise of aeronautical engineering at the present stage. Public Health and Life Environment. 2011;(9):6-9. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 16758041 EDN: OCSQAJ
3. Pankov V.A., Kuleshova M.V., Bochkin G.V., Tyutkina G.A., Dyakovich M.P. Working conditions hygienic assessment and a state of occupational morbidity in the main productions of aircraft industry. Modern problems of science and education. 2016;(6):135. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 27694927 EDN: XIBGGZ
4. Pankov V.A., Rukavishnikov V.S., eds. Meditsina truda rabochikh vibroopasnikh professii v aviastroitelnoi promishlennosti. Irkutsk: RIO IGMAPO; 2013. (In Russ.).
5. Ryabchikova I.A., Petyukova A.V. Occupational risks in the aviation industry. XXI Century. Technosphere Safety. 2021;6(1):103-113. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/2500-1582-2021-1-103-113
6. Usatov A.N., Rodkin V.P. Condition of labor and health protection at aircraft manufacturing enterprises. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2011;(1):55-57 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 17283245 EDN: OOFLHX
7. Izmerov N.F., Bukhtiyarov I.V., Prokopenko L.V. Implementation concept of the state policy aimed at preserving health of Russia working population up to the year 2020 and beyond. Public Health and Life Environment. 2014;(9):4-8. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 22539826 EDN: SZGFJV
8. Rukovodstvo po gigienicheskoi otsenke faktorov rabochei sredi i trudovogo protsessa. Kriterii i klassifikatsiya uslovii truda. Moscow; 2005. (In Russ.).
About the Authors
M. M. SabitovaRussian Federation
Minzilya M. Sabitova - Assistant of the department of general hygiene.
Kazan
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest
A. V. Shulaev
Russian Federation
Aleksey V. Shulaev - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, head of Department of general hygiene.
Kazan
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest
Z. M. Berkheeva
Russian Federation
Zukhra M. Berkheeva - associate professor of department of preventive medicine and human ecology.
Kazan
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest
R. V. Garipova
Russian Federation
Railya V. Garipova - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor of the department of hygiene, occupational medicine, KSMA, Kazan, Russia; professor of the department of preventive medicine, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal university; Professor of the department of general hygiene, KSMA.
Kazan
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest
A. Z. Sabitov
Russian Federation
Azat Z. Sabitov – physician.
Kazan
Competing Interests:
Authors declares no conflict of interest
Review
For citations:
Sabitova M.M., Shulaev A.V., Berkheeva Z.M., Garipova R.V., Sabitov A.Z. Working condition and health status of employees of the aviation enterprise. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2024;15(2):155-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2024-15-2-155-160