mvjrМедицинский вестник Юга РоссииMedical Herald of the South of Russia2219-80752618-7876The Rostov State Medical University10.21886/2219-8075-2014-4-15-18mvjr-26Research ArticleОБЗОРЫREVIEWПРЕОДОЛЕНИЕ АДГЕЗИОГЕНЕЗАOVERCOMING OF ADHESIOGENESISНазаренкоа. А.NazarenkoA. A.

Кафедра хирургии им. Н.Д. Монастырского

Department of Surgery named after N.D. Monastyrsky

hazapov@gmail.comАкимовВ. П.AkimovV. P.

Кафедра хирургии им. Н.Д. Монастырского

Department of Surgery named after N.D. Monastyrsky

Северо-Западный государственный медицинский университет имени И.И.МечниковаРоссияNorth-Western State Medical University named after I.I.MechnikovRussian Federation201430122014041518Copyright © Назаренко а.А., Акимов В.П., 20142014Назаренко а.А., Акимов В.П.Nazarenko A.A., Akimov V.P.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.medicalherald.ru/jour/article/view/26

Естественной реакцией брюшины в ответ на ее повреждение во время хирургических манипуляций является формирование спаек, которые могут стать причиной абдоминальных болей, женского бесплодия и кишечной непроходимости. Некоторые хирургические барьеры показали эффективность в профилактике формирования спаек. В данном обзоре рассмотрены барьерные средства, их эффективность и новые  тенденции в лечении и профилактике адгезиогенеза в брюшной полости.

Adhesion formation in the peritoneal cavity due to surgical operating trauma may cause an infertility, abdominal pain and bowel obstruction. Nowadays the poor knowledge of the adhesion formation within abdominal cavity limits treatment methods for such patients. This review is dedicated to estimating of features of adhesion formation and implementation of methods of prevention and treatment strategy of adhesion formation during postoperative period in abdominal cavity.

внутрибрюшные спайкиадгезиогенезпротивоспаечный барьерabdominal adhesionsadhesiogenesisadhesion barrierReferencesArung W., Meurisse M., Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions // World J Gastroenterol. – 2011. – Vol. 17. – P. 4545-4553.Arung W., Meurisse M., Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions // World J Gastroenterol. – 2011. – Vol. 17. – P. 4545-4553.Mais V. Peritoneal adhesions after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery // World J Gastroenterol. – 2014. – Vol. 20, № 17. – P. 4917-25.Mais V. Peritoneal adhesions after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery // World J Gastroenterol. – 2014. – Vol. 20, № 17. – P. 4917-25.Cheong Y., Laird S., Li T., et al. Peritoneal healing and adhesion formation/reformation // Hum Reprod Update. – 2001. – Vol. 7. – P. 556-566.Cheong Y., Laird S., Li T., et al. Peritoneal healing and adhesion formation/reformation // Hum Reprod Update. – 2001. – Vol. 7. – P. 556-566.Diamond M., Freeman M. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions // Hum Reprod Update. – 2001. – Vol. 7. – P. 567-576.Diamond M., Freeman M. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions // Hum Reprod Update. – 2001. – Vol. 7. – P. 567-576.Wilson M. S., Ellis H., Menzies D., et al. A review of the management of small bowel obstruction. Members of the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study (SCAR). // Ann R Coll Surg Engl. – 1999. – Vol. 81, № 5. – P. 320-8.Wilson M. S., Ellis H., Menzies D., et al. A review of the management of small bowel obstruction. Members of the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study (SCAR). // Ann R Coll Surg Engl. – 1999. – Vol. 81, № 5. – P. 320-8.Menzies D., Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions-how big is the problem? // Ann R Coll Surg Engl. – 1990. – Vol. 72. – P. 60-63.Menzies D., Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions-how big is the problem? // Ann R Coll Surg Engl. – 1990. – Vol. 72. – P. 60-63.Coccolini F., Ansaloni L., Manfredi R., et al. Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI): proposal of a score for the «ignored iceberg» of medicine and surgery // World Journal of Emergency Surgery. – 2013. – Vol. 8, № 1. – P. 6.Coccolini F., Ansaloni L., Manfredi R., et al. Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI): proposal of a score for the «ignored iceberg» of medicine and surgery // World Journal of Emergency Surgery. – 2013. – Vol. 8, № 1. – P. 6.Alonso J. D., Alves A. L., Watanabe M. J., et al. Peritoneal Response to Abdominal Surgery: The Role of Equine Abdominal Adhesions and Current Prophylactic Strategies // Vet Med Int. – 2014. – Vol. 2014. – P. 279-730.Alonso J. D., Alves A. L., Watanabe M. J., et al. Peritoneal Response to Abdominal Surgery: The Role of Equine Abdominal Adhesions and Current Prophylactic Strategies // Vet Med Int. – 2014. – Vol. 2014. – P. 279-730.Atta M. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions: a promising role for gene therapy // World J Gastroenterol. – 2011. – Vol. 17. – P. 5049-5058.Atta M. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions: a promising role for gene therapy // World J Gastroenterol. – 2011. – Vol. 17. – P. 5049-5058.Aarons C., Cohen P., Gower A., et al. Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) decrease postoperative adhesions by increasing peritoneal fibrinolytic activity // Ann Surg. – 2007. – Vol. 245. – P. 176-184.Aarons C., Cohen P., Gower A., et al. Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) decrease postoperative adhesions by increasing peritoneal fibrinolytic activity // Ann Surg. – 2007. – Vol. 245. – P. 176-184.Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive Surgeons. Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery: a committee opinion // Fertil Steril. – 2013. – Vol. 99, № 6. – P. 1550-1555.Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive Surgeons. Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery: a committee opinion // Fertil Steril. – 2013. – Vol. 99, № 6. – P. 1550-1555.Catena F., Di Saverio S., Kelly M., et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2010 evidence-based guidelines of the world society of emergency surgery // World J Emerg Surg. – 2011. – Vol. 6. – P. 5.Catena F., Di Saverio S., Kelly M., et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2010 evidence-based guidelines of the world society of emergency surgery // World J Emerg Surg. – 2011. – Vol. 6. – P. 5.Di Saverio S., Coccolini F., Galati M., et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group // World Journal of Emergency Surgery. – 2013. – Vol. 8. – P. 42.Di Saverio S., Coccolini F., Galati M., et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group // World Journal of Emergency Surgery. – 2013. – Vol. 8. – P. 42.Cahill R. A., Redmond H. P. Cytokine orchestration in post-operative peritoneal adhesion formation // World J Gastroenterol. 2008. ‒ Vol. 14, № 31. ‒ P. 4861-6.Cahill R. A., Redmond H. P. Cytokine orchestration in post-operative peritoneal adhesion formation // World J Gastroenterol. 2008. ‒ Vol. 14, № 31. ‒ P. 4861-6.Hellebrekers B., Kooistra T. Pathogenesis of postoperative adhesion formation // Br J Surg. – 2011. – Vol. 98. – P. 1503 - 1516.Hellebrekers B., Kooistra T. Pathogenesis of postoperative adhesion formation // Br J Surg. – 2011. – Vol. 98. – P. 1503 - 1516.1Xu X., Rivkind A., Pappo O., Pikarsky A., Levi-Schaffer F. Role of mast cells and myofibroblasts in human peritoneal adhesion formation // Ann Surg. – 2002. – Vol. 236, № 5. – P. 593-601.1Xu X., Rivkind A., Pappo O., Pikarsky A., Levi-Schaffer F. Role of mast cells and myofibroblasts in human peritoneal adhesion formation // Ann Surg. – 2002. – Vol. 236, № 5. – P. 593-601.Reed K. L., Fruin A. B., Gower A. C., et al. A neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist decreases postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation and increases peritoneal fibrinolytic activity // Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. – 2004. – Vol. 101, № 24. – P. 9115-9120.Reed K. L., Fruin A. B., Gower A. C., et al. A neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist decreases postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation and increases peritoneal fibrinolytic activity // Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. – 2004. – Vol. 101, № 24. – P. 9115-9120.Chegini N., Kotseos K., Zhao Y., et al. Differential expression of TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta3 in serosal tissues of human intraperitoneal organs and peritoneal adhesions // Hum Reprod. – 2001. – Vol. 16. – P. 129 1300.Chegini N., Kotseos K., Zhao Y., et al. Differential expression of TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta3 in serosal tissues of human intraperitoneal organs and peritoneal adhesions // Hum Reprod. – 2001. – Vol. 16. – P. 129 1300.Wallwiener M., Koninckx P. R., Hackethal A., et al. A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons // Gynecol Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 11. – P. 105-112.Wallwiener M., Koninckx P. R., Hackethal A., et al. A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons // Gynecol Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 11. – P. 105-112.Koninckx P. R., Binda M. M., Corona R., et al. Postoperative adhesions and their prevention // Reconstructive and Reproductive Surgery in Gynecology, 2010. – P. 8-17.Koninckx P. R., Binda M. M., Corona R., et al. Postoperative adhesions and their prevention // Reconstructive and Reproductive Surgery in Gynecology, 2010. – P. 8-17.Koninckx P. R., Corona R., Timmerman D., et al. Peritoneal full-conditioning reduces postoperative adhesions and pain: a randomised controlled trial in deep endometriosis surgery // Journal of Ovarian Research. – 2013. – Vol. 6. – P. 90.Koninckx P. R., Corona R., Timmerman D., et al. Peritoneal full-conditioning reduces postoperative adhesions and pain: a randomised controlled trial in deep endometriosis surgery // Journal of Ovarian Research. – 2013. – Vol. 6. – P. 90.ten Broek R. P., Stommel M. W., Strik C., et al. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Lancet. – 2014. – Vol. 383, № 9911. – P. 48-59.ten Broek R. P., Stommel M. W., Strik C., et al. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Lancet. – 2014. – Vol. 383, № 9911. – P. 48-59.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.