mvjrМедицинский вестник Юга РоссииMedical Herald of the South of Russia2219-80752618-7876The Rostov State Medical University10.21886/2219-8075-2025-16-4-20-27mvjr-2100Research ArticleАКУШЕРСТВО И ГИНЕКОЛОГИЯOBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGYИндукция родовой деятельности как фактор разрыва маткиInduction of labour as a factor in uterine rupturehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2228-3884ЦхайВ. Б.TskhayV. B.

Цхай Виталий Борисович, д.м.н., профессор, заведующий кафедрой перинатологии, акушерства и гинекологии лечебного факультета

Красноярск

Vitaly B. Tskhay, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Perinatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine

Krasnoyarsk

tchai@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5798-4659ДомрачеваМ. Я.DomrachevaM. Ya.

Домрачева Марина Яковлевна, к.м.н., доцент кафедры перинатологии, акушерства и гинекологии лечебного факультета

Красноярск

Marina Ya. Domracheva, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Perinatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine

Krasnoyarsk

m-domracheva@mail.ruКрасноярский государственный медицинский университет им. проф. В.Ф. Войно-ЯсенецкогоРоссияProf. V. F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical UniversityRussian Federation2025211220251642027Copyright © Цхай В.Б., Домрачева М.Я., 20252025Цхай В.Б., Домрачева М.Я.Tskhay V.B., Domracheva M.Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.medicalherald.ru/jour/article/view/2100

В последние годы в акушерстве наблюдается увеличение частоты индукции родов. В развитых странах их частота колеблется от 6,8 до 35,5%. Причины увеличения частоты индукции родов — возрастание числа женщин с высокими перинатальным и акушерским рисками. Индукция родов не является безопасной процедурой, а эффективность зависит от правильного выбора показаний и противопоказаний, времени проведения и метода. Индукция считается обоснованной, если её использование улучшает материнские и перинатальные исходы и не приводит к увеличению числа осложнений. Одним из осложнений индукции является разрыв матки. В статье проведён научный обзор литературы, посвящённый важной проблеме — разрыву матки в акушерской практике, связанному с индукцией родовой деятельности. Анализ данных производился на основании зарубежных и отечественных источников («e-Library», «MedLine», «PubMed») за 2005–2025 гг. по следующим ключевым словам: «разрыв матки», «индукция родов», «гемоперитонеум», «перинатальная смертность». Из 90 статей, в которых сообщалось о разрыве матки, связанных с индукцией родов, было отобрано 39 статей, соответствующих критериям отбора (отсутствовали другие факторы риска разрыва матки). Обобщение имеющейся в литературе информации, отражающей аспекты этого вопроса, поможет адекватно оценить риски при проведении индукции родов и сделать её безопасной.

In recent years, there has been an increase in the frequency of labor induction in obstetrics. In developed countries, their frequency ranges from 6.8 to 35.5 per cent. The reasons for the increase in the frequency of induction of labour are the growing number of women with high perinatal and obstetric risk. Induction of labour is not a safe procedure, and its effectiveness depends on the correct choice of indications, contraindications, timing and methods. Induction is considered justified if its use improves maternal and perinatal outcomes and does not increase complications. One of the complications of induction is uterine rupture. The article presents a scientific review of the literature devoted to an important problem – uterine rupture in obstetric practice associated with induction of labor. The data were analyzed based on foreign and domestic sources (e-Library, MedLine, PubMed) for 2005–2025 using the following keywords: “uterine rupture”, “labor induction”, “hemoperitoneum”, “perinatal mortality”. Of the 90 articles reporting uterine rupture associated with labor induction, 39 articles were selected that met the selection criteria (there were no other risk factors for uterine rupture). Summarising the information available in the literature reflecting aspects of this issue will help to adequately assess the risks of induction of labour and make it safe.

индукция родовразрыв маткигемоперитонеумперинатальная смертностьinduction of labouruterine rupturehemoperitoneumperinatal mortalityИсследование не имело спонсорской поддержки.The study did not have sponsorship.ReferencesMa K, Yang M, Feng X, Liu L, Li L, Li Y. Predictors of vaginal delivery following balloon catheter for labor induction in women with one previous cesarean. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):417. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05734-yMa K, Yang M, Feng X, Liu L, Li L, Li Y. Predictors of vaginal delivery following balloon catheter for labor induction in women with one previous cesarean. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):417. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05734-yChiossi G, D'Amico R, Tramontano AL, Sampogna V, Laghi V, Facchinetti F. Prevalence of uterine rupture among women with one prior low transverse cesarean and women with unscarred uterus undergoing labor induction with PGE2: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0253957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253957Chiossi G, D'Amico R, Tramontano AL, Sampogna V, Laghi V, Facchinetti F. Prevalence of uterine rupture among women with one prior low transverse cesarean and women with unscarred uterus undergoing labor induction with PGE2: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0253957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253957Kayani SI, Alfirevic Z. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section. BJOG. 2005;112(4):451-455. Erratum in: BJOG. 2005;112(4):528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00336.xKayani SI, Alfirevic Z. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section. BJOG. 2005;112(4):451-455. Erratum in: BJOG. 2005;112(4):528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00336.xBendix JM, Friis Petersen J, Andersen BR, Bødker B, Løkkegaard EC. Induction of labor with high- or low-dosage oral misoprostol-A Danish descriptive retrospective cohort study 2015-16. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(2):222-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13739Bendix JM, Friis Petersen J, Andersen BR, Bødker B, Løkkegaard EC. Induction of labor with high- or low-dosage oral misoprostol-A Danish descriptive retrospective cohort study 2015-16. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(2):222-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13739Bossung V, Rath W, Rody A, Schwarz C. Heterogenous use of misoprostol for induction of labour: results of an online survey among midwives in German-speaking countries. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(6):1501-1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06079-7Bossung V, Rath W, Rody A, Schwarz C. Heterogenous use of misoprostol for induction of labour: results of an online survey among midwives in German-speaking countries. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(6):1501-1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06079-7Kehl S, Weiss C, Rath W, Schneider M, Stumpfe F, et al. Labour Induction with Misoprostol in German Obstetric Clinics: What Are the Facts on Such Use? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021;81(8):955-965. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1538-2200Kehl S, Weiss C, Rath W, Schneider M, Stumpfe F, et al. Labour Induction with Misoprostol in German Obstetric Clinics: What Are the Facts on Such Use? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021;81(8):955-965. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1538-2200Weeks A, Faúndes A. Misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99 Suppl 2:S156-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.09.003Weeks A, Faúndes A. Misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99 Suppl 2:S156-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.09.003Rouzi AA, Alsahly N, Alamoudi R, Almansouri N, Alsinani N, et al. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(4):405.e1-405.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1054Rouzi AA, Alsahly N, Alamoudi R, Almansouri N, Alsinani N, et al. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(4):405.e1-405.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1054AlSaad D, Alobaidly S, Abdulrouf P, Thomas B, Ahmed A, AlHail M. Misoprostol for miscarriage management in a woman with previous five cesarean deliveries: a case report and literature review. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017;13:625-627. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S132294AlSaad D, Alobaidly S, Abdulrouf P, Thomas B, Ahmed A, AlHail M. Misoprostol for miscarriage management in a woman with previous five cesarean deliveries: a case report and literature review. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017;13:625-627. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S132294Daskalakis G, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Papageorgiou J, Antsaklis A. Sonographic findings and surgical management of a uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol during second-trimester abortion. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(11):1565-1568. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2005.24.11.1565Daskalakis G, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Papageorgiou J, Antsaklis A. Sonographic findings and surgical management of a uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol during second-trimester abortion. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(11):1565-1568. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2005.24.11.1565Jha N, Sagili H, Sharma J, Jha AK. A Rare Type of Uterine Rupture Following Over-the-Counter Use of Misoprostol in Second Trimester Abortion. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2021;21(4):657-659. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.4.2021.050Jha N, Sagili H, Sharma J, Jha AK. A Rare Type of Uterine Rupture Following Over-the-Counter Use of Misoprostol in Second Trimester Abortion. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2021;21(4):657-659. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.4.2021.050Aduloju OP, Ipinnimo OM, Aduloju T. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial of hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(4):493-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1610378Aduloju OP, Ipinnimo OM, Aduloju T. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial of hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(4):493-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1610378Abbasi N, Danish N, Shakoor F, Parveen Z, Bilal SA. Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in unfavourable cervix in 3rd trimester. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20(3):33-35. PMID: 19610511Abbasi N, Danish N, Shakoor F, Parveen Z, Bilal SA. Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in unfavourable cervix in 3rd trimester. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20(3):33-35. PMID: 19610511Dorr ML, Pierson RC, Daggy J, Quinney SK, Haas DM. Buccal versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Term Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(7):765-772. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675219Dorr ML, Pierson RC, Daggy J, Quinney SK, Haas DM. Buccal versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Term Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(7):765-772. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675219Haas DM, Daggy J, Flannery KM, Dorr ML, Bonsack C, et al. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):259.e1-259.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.037Haas DM, Daggy J, Flannery KM, Dorr ML, Bonsack C, et al. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):259.e1-259.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.037Belmajdoub M, Alaoui FZF, Chaara H, Melhouf A. Rupture utérine sur utérus sain: complication du misoprostol (à propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature) [Uterine rupture in patients with healthy uterus: misoprostol complication (case study and literature review)]. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;31:223. (In French). https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.31.223.12906Belmajdoub M, Alaoui FZF, Chaara H, Melhouf A. Rupture utérine sur utérus sain: complication du misoprostol (à propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature) [Uterine rupture in patients with healthy uterus: misoprostol complication (case study and literature review)]. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;31:223. (In French). https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.31.223.12906Aslan H, Unlu E, Agar M, Ceylan Y. Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;113(1):45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00363-4Aslan H, Unlu E, Agar M, Ceylan Y. Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;113(1):45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00363-4Dekker GA, Chan A, Luke CG, Priest K, Riley M, et al. Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective populationbased cohort study. BJOG. 2010;117(11):1358-1365. Erratum in: BJOG. 2010;117(13):1672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.xDekker GA, Chan A, Luke CG, Priest K, Riley M, et al. Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective populationbased cohort study. BJOG. 2010;117(11):1358-1365. Erratum in: BJOG. 2010;117(13):1672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.xOphir E, Odeh M, Hirsch Y, Bornstein J. Uterine rupture during trial of labor: controversy of induction's methods. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67(11):734-745. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e318273feebOphir E, Odeh M, Hirsch Y, Bornstein J. Uterine rupture during trial of labor: controversy of induction's methods. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67(11):734-745. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e318273feebGobillot S, Ghenassia A, Coston AL, Gillois P, Equy V, et al. Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labour after caesarean section. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(10):539-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.09.006Gobillot S, Ghenassia A, Coston AL, Gillois P, Equy V, et al. Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labour after caesarean section. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(10):539-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.09.006Zhang H, Liu H, Luo S, Gu W. Oxytocin use in trial of labor after cesarean and its relationship with risk of uterine rupture in women with one previous cesarean section: a metaanalysis of observational studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03440-7Zhang H, Liu H, Luo S, Gu W. Oxytocin use in trial of labor after cesarean and its relationship with risk of uterine rupture in women with one previous cesarean section: a metaanalysis of observational studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03440-7Cahill AG, Waterman BM, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Allsworth JE, et al. Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(1):32.e1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.001Cahill AG, Waterman BM, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Allsworth JE, et al. Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(1):32.e1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.001Atia O, Rotem R, Reichman O, Jaffe A, Grisaru-Granovsky S, et al. Number of prior vaginal deliveries and trial of labor after cesarean success. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;256:189-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.009Atia O, Rotem R, Reichman O, Jaffe A, Grisaru-Granovsky S, et al. Number of prior vaginal deliveries and trial of labor after cesarean success. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;256:189-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.009Huisman CMA, Ten Eikelder MLG, Mast K, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, et al. Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(7):920-928. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13558Huisman CMA, Ten Eikelder MLG, Mast K, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, et al. Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(7):920-928. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13558Levin G, Tsur A, Burke YZ, Meyer R. Methods of induction of labor after cesarean with no prior vaginal delivery-Perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;160(2):612-619. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14318Levin G, Tsur A, Burke YZ, Meyer R. Methods of induction of labor after cesarean with no prior vaginal delivery-Perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;160(2):612-619. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14318Rath W, Hellmeyer L, Tsikouras P, Stelzl P. Mechanical Methods for the Induction of Labour After Previous Caesarean Section - An Updated, Evidence-based Review. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022;82(7):727-735. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1731-7441Rath W, Hellmeyer L, Tsikouras P, Stelzl P. Mechanical Methods for the Induction of Labour After Previous Caesarean Section - An Updated, Evidence-based Review. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022;82(7):727-735. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1731-7441Sarreau M, Isly H, Poulain P, Fontaine B, Morel O, et al. Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(2):259-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13712Sarreau M, Isly H, Poulain P, Fontaine B, Morel O, et al. Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(2):259-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13712Radan AP, Amylidi-Mohr S, Mosimann B, Simillion C, Raio L, Mueller M, Surbek D. Safety and effectiveness of labour induction after caesarean section using balloon catheter or oxytocin. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147:w14532. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2017.14532Radan AP, Amylidi-Mohr S, Mosimann B, Simillion C, Raio L, Mueller M, Surbek D. Safety and effectiveness of labour induction after caesarean section using balloon catheter or oxytocin. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147:w14532. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2017.14532Jozwiak M, van de Lest HA, Burger NB, Dijksterhuis MG, De Leeuw JW. Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(3):296-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.1232029 Jozwiak M, van de Lest HA, Burger NB, Dijksterhuis MG, De Leeuw JW. Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(3):296-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12320Katz Eriksen JL, Chandrasekaran S, Delaney SS. Is Foley Catheter Use during a Trial of Labor after Cesarean Associated with Uterine Rupture? Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(14):1431-1436. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1691766Katz Eriksen JL, Chandrasekaran S, Delaney SS. Is Foley Catheter Use during a Trial of Labor after Cesarean Associated with Uterine Rupture? Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(14):1431-1436. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1691766Cheuk QK, Lo TK, Lee CP, Yeung AP. Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review. Hong Kong Med J. 2015;21(3):243-250. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj144404Cheuk QK, Lo TK, Lee CP, Yeung AP. Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review. Hong Kong Med J. 2015;21(3):243-250. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj144404Boujenah J, Fleury C, Tigaizin A, Benbara A, Mounsambote L, et al. Déclenchement par ballonnet en cas d’utérus cicatriciel et col défavorable : la tentative en vaut-elle la chandelle ? [Induction of labor in women with previous caesarean delivery with balloon catheter: Is it worth it?]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019;47(3):273-280. (In French) Erratum in: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019;47(7-8):615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2019.01.008Boujenah J, Fleury C, Tigaizin A, Benbara A, Mounsambote L, et al. Déclenchement par ballonnet en cas d’utérus cicatriciel et col défavorable : la tentative en vaut-elle la chandelle ? [Induction of labor in women with previous caesarean delivery with balloon catheter: Is it worth it?]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019;47(3):273-280. (In French) Erratum in: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019;47(7-8):615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2019.01.008Jozwiak M, Dodd JM. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD009792. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD009792. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009792.pub2Jozwiak M, Dodd JM. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD009792. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD009792. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009792.pub2Vecchioli E, Cordier AG, Chantry A, Benachi A, Monier I. Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: A French retrospective study. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237132. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237132Vecchioli E, Cordier AG, Chantry A, Benachi A, Monier I. Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: A French retrospective study. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237132. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237132Bashirudin SB, Omar SZ, Gan F, Hamdan M, Tan PC. Induction of labor after one previous cesarean: Predictors of vaginal birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023;20:100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100249Bashirudin SB, Omar SZ, Gan F, Hamdan M, Tan PC. Induction of labor after one previous cesarean: Predictors of vaginal birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023;20:100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100249Цхай В.Б., Домрачева М.Я., Менцик М.М., Брюханова А.А., Семенова Ю.Е., и др. Сравнительный анализ эффективности и безопасности различных методов индукции родовой деятельности при доношенной беременности: рандомизированное проспективное исследование. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2024;23(2):38–44.Цхай В.Б., Домрачева М.Я., Менцик М.М., Брюханова А.А., Семенова Ю.Е., и др. Сравнительный анализ эффективности и безопасности различных методов индукции родовой деятельности при доношенной беременности: рандомизированное проспективное исследование. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2024;23(2):38–44.Tskhay V.B., Domracheva M.Ya., Mentsik M.M., Bryuhanova A.A., Semenova Yu.E., et al. Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of different methods of labor induction in full-term pregnancy: a randomized prospective study. Vopr. ginekol. akus. perinatol. (Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology). 2024;23(2):38–44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2024-2-38-44Tskhay V.B., Domracheva M.Ya., Mentsik M.M., Bryuhanova A.A., Semenova Yu.E., et al. Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of different methods of labor induction in full-term pregnancy: a randomized prospective study. Vopr. ginekol. akus. perinatol. (Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology). 2024;23(2):38–44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2024-2-38-44

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.